Add QWK prepack to chopping block list and HTMLterm to graveyardI was hoping one day to see the HTMLterm come to fruition, but it was pretty much deprecated before it even had a chance :(
Add QWK prepack to chopping block list and HTMLterm to graveyard
Add QWK prepack to chopping block list and HTMLterm to graveyard
I was hoping one day to see the HTMLterm come to fruition, but it was pretty much deprecated before it even had a chance :(
---
Tim (kk4qbn)
+o kk4qbn.synchro.net
þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - kk4qbn.synchro.net - Chatsworth, GA USA
I'm able to quote his message with SlyEdit; not seeing any problems here.. It looks like we're using the same version of SlyEdit, too (the headers show you're using SlyEdit 1.90b Ice style).
I'm able to quote his message with SlyEdit; not seeing any problems
Weird. I wasn't able to quote any of kk4qbn's text in my previous message - it just didn't show up in the quote selection box - however I was able to quote the quoted text from his message.
I'm able to quote his message with SlyEdit; not seeing any problems
here.. It looks like we're using the same version of SlyEdit, too (the
headers show you're using SlyEdit 1.90b Ice style).
Weird. I wasn't able to quote any of kk4qbn's text in my previous message
- it just didn't show up in the quote selection box - however I was able
to quote the quoted text from his message.
I went back and checked that message and it is a possibility that I was using just the regular line editor to write the original message to DM, that could be the issue. I don't know why it would be, but I don't think
Wiki edit of http://wiki.synchro.net/dev:chopping_block by digital man:
Add QWK prepack to chopping block list and HTMLterm to graveyard
Re: [wiki.synchro.net] page changed: dev:chopping_block
By: digital man to wiki.synchro.net on Thu Sep 12 2024 12:39:42
Wiki edit of http://wiki.synchro.net/dev:chopping_block by digital man: Add QWK prepack to chopping block list and HTMLterm to graveyard
What does QWK prepack do?
Allows a sysop to have their system preemptively create QWK packets for specific users (e.g. QWKnet nodes), nightly.
Once upon a time, creating a QWK packet took a measurable amount of time (exporting the messages to QWK format, zipping the messages into a .QWK file), and QWKnet nodes might want to save those long-distance
phone charges and have their packet already created and waiting for them when they made their once-a-day phone-modem call to their QWKnet hub to upload their replies (from the day before) and download their
new
messages in a QWK packet. I doubt anybody needs this optimization any more.
I have one dial up user that still uses a QWK offline reader. Hopefully they won't be impacted by this change ... ?
If you've never heard of Pre-packed QWK, then you're not using the feature and >your dial-up user won't know if it's removed. I believe this to be true of >every other Synchronet system too.
If you've never heard of Pre-packed QWK, then you're not using the feature and your dial-up user won't know if it's removed. I believe this to be true of every other Synchronet system too.
Are your other JS files up to date? SlyEdit uses dd_lightbar_menu.js (in exec/load) for the quote selection box - I have made updates to that to
Are your other JS files up to date? SlyEdit uses dd_lightbar_menu.js (in
exec/load) for the quote selection box - I have made updates to that to
They're all of the same vintage, which is about two weeks ago. If you've fixed something since then I wouldn't have it yet, but I'll update soon.
I have mixed feelings about the flashy features in SyncTERM today too...
| Sysop: | Weed Hopper |
|---|---|
| Location: | Clearwater, FL |
| Users: | 14 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 233:41:39 |
| Calls: | 55 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 50,128 |
| D/L today: |
42 files (6,293K bytes) |
| Messages: | 275,432 |