• Fear not the deadlines

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Monday, April 24, 2023 22:30:26
    Fear not the deadlines
    First-of-its-kind study suggest researchers' stress levels stay the same
    with or without deadlines

    Date:
    April 24, 2023
    Source:
    University of Houston
    Summary:
    New research suggests the stress levels of knowledge workers,
    such as researchers or journalists, stays the same with or without
    deadlines.


    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email

    ==========================================================================
    FULL STORY ========================================================================== Deadlines are part and parcel of modern knowledge work. Journalists must
    serve their weekly columns, managers must turn in their monthly reports,
    and researchers must submit their papers and proposals on time. Despite
    their ubiquity, deadlines conjure up negative feelings and are perceived
    as challenging events. Accordingly, there has been a trend to do away with deadlines, where possible. For instance, the National Science Foundation
    (NSF) in the United States introduced no-deadline submissions in some of
    its funding programs. Critics, however, have been arguing that although deadlines may be painful, they are necessary, because they motivate
    people to act.

    Researchers from the University of Houston, Texas A&M, and the Polytechnic
    of Milano set out to address the question at the heart of the matter:
    "Does knowledge work near deadlines incur higher sympathetic load than knowledge work away from deadlines?" Sympathetic activation is the state
    of physiological arousal that indicates how much people are "on the tips
    of their toes," and often leads to stress. This is why its intensity
    and duration should be kept in check, according to the researchers.

    The first-of-its-kind study published in the Proceedings of the ACM Human Factors in Computing, was led by Ioannis Pavlidis, professor of computer science and director of the Affective and Data Computing Laboratory at UH.

    Per an institutionally approved ethical protocol, 10 consenting
    researchers were monitored as they worked at the office in the two days
    leading to a critical deadline, and two other days without an impeding deadline. Miniature cameras were placed at the researchers' university
    office to unobtrusively record their facial physiology and expressions,
    as well as their movements throughout the working day. The participants' sympathetic activation was measured every second through quantification
    of their imaged perinasal perspiration levels.

    Applying advanced data modeling on hundreds of hours of data recordings,
    the team found that researchers experience high sympathetic activation
    while working, which speaks to the challenging nature of the research profession.

    Surprisingly, this high sympathetic activation remains about the same
    with or without deadlines.

    "Research is tough every day," said Pavlidis. "Using a metaphor, if
    you are under heavy rain all the time, if one day the rain is a little
    heavier, it would not make much difference to you because you are already
    wet to the bone.

    This is what our models show with respect to the effect of deadlines on researchers." The only factors found to exacerbate sympathetic activation
    were extensive smartphone use and prolific reading/writing. The first
    factor is a manifestation of the gadget-based addiction trends that
    have altered human behaviors across the board. The second factor is
    integral to research work, and thus unavoidable. Thankfully, however, researchers appear to auto-regulate increases in their sympathetic
    activation by instinctively adjusting the frequency of physical breaks. It
    was observed that on average, researchers take one physical break every
    two hours. From this baseline, data analysis showed that for every 50%
    increase in sympathetic activation, the break frequency nearly doubles, revealing the limits of cognitive work under increasing stress.

    "Our naturalistic study not only brings fresh insights into researchers' behaviors but also challenges some prevailing views about deadlines,"
    Pavlidis said. "With the recent advances in affective computing, I expect
    such naturalistic studies to proliferate across domains, challenging misconceptions we hold about a lot of things," added Pavlidis.

    The study was funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation.

    * RELATED_TOPICS
    o Mind_&_Brain
    # Stress # Intelligence # Behavior # Alcoholism # Memory #
    Anxiety # Spirituality # Psychology
    * RELATED_TERMS
    o What_is_knowledge? o Scientific_method o Facial_symmetry
    o Cognition o Self-realization o Intuition_(knowledge) o
    Intellectual_giftedness o Great_Ape_language

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by University_of_Houston. Note: Content
    may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. MD Tanim Hasan, Shaila Zaman, Amanveer Wesley, Panagiotis
    Tsiamyrtzis,
    Ioannis Pavlidis. Sympathetic Activation in Deadlines of Deskbound
    Research - A Study in the Wild. CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts
    of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
    2023 DOI: 10.1145/3544549.3585585 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/04/230424133310.htm

    --- up 1 year, 8 weeks, 10 hours, 50 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)