Participating in genetic studies is in your genes

Date:
July 13, 2023
Source:
University of Oxford
Summary:
Why do some people take part in genetic studies while others do
not? The answer may lie within our genetic makeup. According to a
groundbreaking study, people who participate in genetic studies are
genetically more likely to do so, leaving detectable 'footprints'
in genetics data. This breakthrough equips researchers with the
ability to identify and address participation bias, a significant
challenge in genetic research.


Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email

==========================================================================
FULL STORY ==========================================================================
Why do some people take part in genetic studies while others do not? The
answer may lie within our genetic makeup. According to a groundbreaking
study by Oxford's Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science and Big Data Institute, people who participate in genetic studies are genetically more likely to do so, leaving detectable 'footprints' in genetics data. This breakthrough equips researchers with the ability to identify and address participation bias, a significant challenge in genetic research.

Stefania Benonisdottir, lead author of the study and a Doctoral candidate
from Oxford's Big Data Institute, explains, 'Currently, most genetic
studies are based on genetic databases which contain large numbers of participants and a wealth of information. However, some people are more
likely to be included in these databases than others, which can create
a problem called ascertainment bias, where the genetic data collected
is not representative of the intended study population.' To study this
link between genetics data and participation bias, the researchers turned
to one of the largest biomedical databases in the world, the UK Biobank
which contains information from half a million participants.

Using UK Biobank data, it was found there is a genetic component to
people's probability to participate -- that is correlated but distinct
from other human traits. Published today in Nature Genetics, the study highlights that participation could be an important human trait that has
been previously underappreciated and introduces a statistical framework
that could lead to more accurate analyses of genetic data.

Professor Augustine Kong, senior author from the Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science and the Big Data Institute, notes, 'Ascertainment
bias poses a statistical challenge in genetics research, particularly
in the era of big data. Adjustments for this bias often rely on known differences between participants and non-participants, introducing imperfections when answering questions involving variables only observed
for participants, such as genotypes. Our study identifies detectable
footprints of participation bias in the genetic data of participants,
which can be exploited statistically to enhance research accuracy for
both participants and non-participants alike.' Genome-wide association
studies offer important insights into the role of genetics in human
health and diseases. However, such studies can be affected by biases,
which arise when genetic databases are not representative of the intended
study population. Now, the identified genetic inclination to participate
can help scientists assess the representativeness of their study sample.

By analysing the genetic data of over 30,000 related participants
with white British descent from the UK Biobank, the researchers found
that the genetic component underlying participation in the study is
correlated with, but distinct from, the genetic components of traits
such as educational attainment and body mass index.

For example, the estimated correlation between the genetic components underlying participation in the UK Biobank and educational attainment
is estimated to be 36.6%. This result is consistent with some of
the previously reported differences between the participants and the non-participants, but it also shows that the participation bias is not
fully captured by these previously known differences. In other words, participation is not simply a consequence of these other traits and characteristics.

The study also found the genetic component of participation can be
passed down through families and may affect people's participation
in many different studies over their lifetimes. This highlights the
potential for bias in genetic research and underscores the importance
of accounting for such biases in study design and analysis.

Professor Melinda Mills, Director of the Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science concludes, 'As our GWAS Diversity Monitor shows, the road to
improve diversity in genome-wide association studies is long. However,
this statistical framework is a huge step in the right direction to
mitigate the risk of incomplete or inaccurate data analysis and ensure
that genetic research truly benefits everyone.'
* RELATED_TOPICS
o Health_&_Medicine
# Genes # Personalized_Medicine # Gene_Therapy
o Computers_&_Math
# Information_Technology # Hacking # Encryption
o Science_&_Society
# Racial_Disparity # Surveillance # STEM_Education
* RELATED_TERMS
o Genetics o Molecular_biology o Heritability o
Genetically_modified_organism o Haemophilia o Mutation o Cancer
o Meiosis

==========================================================================

Print

Email

Share ========================================================================== ****** 1 ****** ***** 2 ***** **** 3 ****
*** 4 *** ** 5 ** Breaking this hour ==========================================================================
* Overflowing_Cosmic_'Jug' * Ghost_Stars_in_Our_Galaxy *
Multiple_Ecosystems_in_Hot_Water * How_an_'AI-Tocracy'_Emerges
* Building_a_Better_Tree_With_CRISPR_Gene_Editing *
Unprecedented_Control_Of_Every_Finger_of_...

* Widespread_Death_of_Insects:_Air_Pollution
* Webb_Celebrates_First_Year_of_Science *
New_Parkinson's_Disease_Cell_Therapies *
Circular_DNA_Grabs_DNA_Repair_Mechanism:_...


Trending Topics this week ========================================================================== HEALTH_&_MEDICINE Brain_Tumor Nervous_System Stem_Cells MIND_&_BRAIN Intelligence Behavior Brain_Injury LIVING_&_WELL Behavior Healthy_Aging Child_Development


==========================================================================

Strange & Offbeat ========================================================================== HEALTH_&_MEDICINE Surgical_and_Engineering_Innovations_Enable_Unprecedented_Control_Over_Every Finger_of_a_Bionic_Hand Capturing_the_Immense_Potential_of_Microscopic_DNA_for_Data_Storage Revolutionary_Self-Sensing_Electric_Artificial_Muscles MIND_&_BRAIN The_Sound_of_Silence?_Researchers_Demonstrate_People_Hear_It AI_Tests_Into_Top_1%_for_Original_Creative_Thinking Everyone's_Brain_Has_a_Pain_Fingerprint_--_New_Research_Has_Revealed_for_the First_Time LIVING_&_WELL These_Lollipops_Could_'Sweeten'_Diagnostic_Testing_for_Kids_and_Adults_Alike Grocery_Store_Carts_Set_to_Help_Diagnose_Common_Heart_Rhythm_Disorder_and Prevent_Stroke Illusions_Are_in_the_Eye,_Not_the_Mind Story Source:
Materials provided by University_of_Oxford. Note: Content may be edited
for style and length.


========================================================================== Journal Reference:
1. Stefania Benonisdottir, Augustine Kong. Studying the genetics of
participation using footprints left on the ascertained
genotypes. Nature Genetics, 2023; DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01439-2 ==========================================================================

Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230713141947.htm

--- up 1 year, 19 weeks, 3 days, 10 hours, 50 minutes
* Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)