Australia is going through a warm patch. It was 45C (113F) here today - and is supposed to warm up even more later in the week.
G'day
Australia is going through a warm patch. It was 45C (113F) here today
- and is supposed to warm up even more later in the week.
It's just natural and we cannot do anything about it. That it's men made is just a lie created by some liberal democrats or something like this ...
Wow. Mate, we're having a cool spell here... 27C today. Bundy topped about 30C, I think.
It won't last long. Which is good as it's bloody uncomfortable.
It's just natural and we cannot do anything about it. That it's men made
is just a lie created by some liberal democrats or something like this ...
aIt's just natural and we cannot do anything about it. That it's men made is
just a lie created by some liberal democrats or something like this ...
Lol! Oh so we're on to THIS nonsense now, "climate change". I'll admit its
much more entertaining whine-fest topic from you than Fido politics.
It won't last long. Which is good as it's bloody uncomfortable.
The heat or the cool is uncomfortable?
The damned _cool_.
Everything I touch is colder than me now. No fans 'on' since yesterday arvo, and I had to sleep under a light blanket when I woke /frozen/ at 02:30 this AM (21C official, but I reckon it was cooler).
I want my summer back!
I want my summer back!
ROFL
Hop on your push bike and come to South Australia. They're taking 48C by the end of the week.
Australia is going through a warm patch. It was 45C (113F) here today
- and is supposed to warm up even more later in the week.
It's just natural and we cannot do anything about it. That it's men made
is just a lie created by some liberal democrats or something like this ...
It's still uncomfortably warm.
Do you honestly believe that all of the shit mankind pumps into the air,and
all of the land we cover in cement/buildings is NOT affecting the environment?
aIt's just natural and we cannot do anything about it. That it's O>men madeis just a lie created by some liberal democrats or O>something like this ...
Lol! Oh so we're on to THIS nonsense now, "climate change". I'll admit its
much more entertaining whine-fest topic from you than Fido politics.
Australia is going through a warm patch. It was 45C (113F) here DD>today- and is supposed to warm up even more later in the week.
It's just natural and we cannot do anything about it. That it's men made is just a lie created by some liberal democrats or something like this ...
Everything I touch is colder than me now. No fans 'on' since yesterday
arvo, and I had to sleep under a light blanket when I woke /frozen/ at
02:30 this AM (21C official, but I reckon it was cooler).
I do hope and pray you can speak Portuguese. Or Chinese.
I doubt English, or French, will do you much good in the new
world order that is almost here.
And it's only 17C inside the house. :(
On 17/12/2019 18:55, 2280/464.47 wrote:
here todayAustralia is going through a warm patch. It was 45C (113F)
week.- and is supposed to warm up even more later in the
It's just natural and we cannot do anything about it. That it's
men made is just a lie created by some liberal democrats or
something like this ...
It's still uncomfortably warm.
Do you honestly believe that all of the shit mankind pumps into the
air, and all of the land we cover in cement/buildings is NOT
affecting the environment?
On the opposite side of the globe is the Spratly Islands. These
islands are uninhabited, as they are mere rocks in the middle of
nowhere. But the Chinese are building many artificial islands
in that area, claiming the entire area as being part of China.
2010?I do hope and pray you can speak Portuguese. Or Chinese.
I doubt English, or French, will do you much good in the new
world order that is almost here.
LOL, lay off the booze there Bjorn. New world order... You mean the world where Al gore who claimed once that Manhattan would be underwater come
Or any number of climate-change "activists" and Hollywood celebrities who fly
around the world first-class in private jets and live in mansions?
Its nice to see that silly young leader Greta of theclimate-change-hysteria
movement really being true to her angry self with wanting to putpoliticians
"Up against the wall" and enjoying first-class train rides home. After all its tough being a kid, definately exhausting being angry all the time.
Just like "global warming" which proceeded "climate change"... because the former euphanism didn't attract enough panic. And before global warming,it
was the Amazon rain forests. And before that, the polar bears, the whales, acid rain, radeon gas, Aerosol cans and the ozone layer... etc etc...
And all of this was proceeded by something in the early 80's I remember asa
young boy called "Global cooling". If we don't do something about global cooling, the earth will be frozen over by the mid to late 1990's.
So which is it? Frozen planet doomsday nonsense of the 80's, Hot-as-hell planet doomsday nonsense of the 90's or present day planet doomsday "climate change" big sad-kitty-meme nonsense. Hard to decide which is funnier.
Environmental responsibility is one thing. Misguided hysteria is not a thing.
Al Gore does not think it is silly. Pope Francis does not think it
is silly. TIME magazine does not think it is silly. Greta herself
does not think it is silly.
of that acting made her so tired, her and her entourage had to travel first-class on a German train back home; but complain it was crowded.
of that acting made her so tired, her and her entourage had to travel
first-class on a German train back home; but complain it was crowded.
From which alternate reality exactly did you get this "news"?
of that acting made her so tired, her and her entourage had to travel first-class on a German train back home; but complain it was crowded.
From which alternate reality exactly did you get this "news"?
of that acting made her so tired, her and her entourage had to travel
first-class on a German train back home; but complain it was crowded.
From which alternate reality exactly did you get this "news"?
That's a no-brainer. From the same reality where he found out everything else about "angry teenager" Greta: He's a Trumpster!
of that acting made her so tired, her and her entourage had to travel
first-class on a German train back home; but complain it was crowded.
From which alternate reality exactly did you get this "news"?
That's a no-brainer. From the same reality where he found out
everything else about "angry teenager" Greta: He's a Trumpster!
I'm not American, incase you are not sober enough to remember.
Do a goole seach
Other alternate-reality sites are largely quoting the same thing.
Do a goole seach on "greta thunberg first class" and the hundreds of
left and
right wing news feeds say the same thing that she rode first class
and was
outed by the German rail company.
And this turned out to be a full-scale PR-desaster of Deutsche Bahn... just read some /later/ news after the dust setteled. I bet your news outlets didn't bother to continue the story.
Do a goole seach on "greta thunberg first class" and the hundreds of left and right wing news feeds say the same thing that she rode first class
and was outed by the German rail company.
And this turned out to be a full-scale PR-desaster of Deutsche
Bahn... just read some /later/ news after the dust setteled. I bet
your news outlets didn't bother to continue the story.
It seemed none of the english speaking news outlets were updated including all the main outlets.
It seemed none of the english speaking news outlets were updated
including all the main outlets.
That's what I already guessed. This is exactly how "urban legends" are made...
It's a bit like in aviation and the overbooking of airplanes. People
who are overbooked and have no seat will eventually be accomodated in First or Business. Have seen it happening all the time. First the
frequent flyers get upgraded and if that is not enough to create space
in coach-class, then the last-minute fares get to dine on real china.
That's what I already guessed. This is exactly how "urban legends" are made...
It seemed none of the english speaking news outlets were updated
including all the main outlets.
That's what I already guessed. This is exactly how "urban legends" are
made...
LOL! If it's not reported by the US media it's just fake news? 8-)
dramatics,Al Gore does not think it is silly. Pope Francis does not think it
is silly. TIME magazine does not think it is silly. Greta herself
does not think it is silly.
True environmentalism will always take a back-seat to hysterics,
celebrities, sensational nonsense. Time magazine also put Trump and Hitler on
the front cover... but I know you will overlook that little factoid.
Tell me genious, what are Greta's scientific credentials again? I see her dramatic credentials on full display. Her showbiz parents taught her well.
All of that acting made her so tired, her and her entourage had to travel first-class on a German train back home; but complain it was crowded.
Your amusing unfounded nonsense about the poles shifting is nowhere near amusing that the earth was supposed to be completely frozen-over, as per the doomsday prediction of the early 80's.
Or by 2020 global warming of the 90's was going to put the coastal cities underwater. Most of this was Al Gore-initiated nonsense. Al Gore also said Trump would never be president.
For every silly climate hysteria of the day, theres always a pre-set doomsday period of about 10 years, 20, maybe 30. Just enough time for the hysterics to be long gone or moved on before anyone notices they've been climate-duped.
of that acting made her so tired, her and her entourage had to travel
first-class on a German train back home; but complain it was crowded.
From which alternate reality exactly did you get this "news"?
That's a no-brainer. From the same reality where he found out everything else about "angry teenager" Greta: He's a Trumpster!
Nothing will change in the US and elsewhere until we get rid the
vile and stupid Trump types!!
anOn the opposite side of the globe is the Spratly Islands. These
islands are uninhabited, as they are mere rocks in the middle of
nowhere. But the Chinese are building many artificial islands
in that area, claiming the entire area as being part of China.
The Japanese have built a flagpole in the middle of the sea somewhere on
underwater rock. As the pole sticks above the water, they are claiming a 200NM EEZ around it.
Then I think the Russians sawed it off.
Then, I think, the Japanese built a concrete mound on that rock stickingout
above the water and put a flag on it.
More interesting even. The Chileans once airlifted a very pregnant young lady to Teniente R. Marsh Airport on Antarctica and had her deliver her baby there so that "Location of birth:" would be "Villa Las Estrellas",the
only civilian settlement on the continent thereby re-inforcing Chile's claims to mineral-rich territories. The kid's name? Juan Pablo Camacho Martino, So far, a total of three people have been born in the Chilean Bases but after signing the Antarctic minerals treaty this practice became obsolete.
travelof that acting made her so tired, her and her entourage had to
crowded.first-class on a German train back home; but complain it was
From which alternate reality exactly did you get this "news"?
That's a no-brainer. From the same reality where he found out
everything
else about "angry teenager" Greta: He's a Trumpster!
  So, what continent are you living on, then?
For every silly climate hysteria of the day, theres always a pre-set doomsday period of about 10 years, 20, maybe 30. Just enough time for hysterics to be long gone or moved on before anyone notices they've be climate-duped.
Oh, you and others will definitely notice when this pole shift
happens ...
For every silly climate hysteria of the day, theres always NA>a pre-setdoomsday period of about 10 years, 20, maybe 30. NA>Just enough time for hysterics to be long gone or moved NA>on before anyone notices they've be climate-duped.
Oh, you and others will definitely notice when this pole shift
happens ...
It must be exhausting mentally and physically to be you.
Tell me genious....
For every silly climate hysteria of the day, theres always a pre-set doomsday
period of about 10 years, 20, maybe 30. Just enough time for the hysterics to
be long gone or moved on before anyone notices they've been climate-duped.
Nick
Tell me genious....
For every silly climate hysteria of the day, theres always a pre-sethysterics
doomsday
period of about 10 years, 20, maybe 30. Just enough time for the
toclimate-duped.
be long gone or moved on before anyone notices they've been
Nick
Thanks Nick, couldn't have said it better myself. :-)
Thanks Nick, couldn't have said it better myself. :-)
When in doubt, follow the money ...
https://fcpp.org/2019/02/07/lets-do-follow-the-climate-money/
Doesn't address the fact that every decade you
chicken-little nutcases conjure up another hysterical
claim that the world will end in the coming decades.
Doesn't address the fact that every decade you chicken-little nutcases conjure up another hysterical claim that the world will end in the
coming decades.
Thanks Nick, couldn't have said it better myself. :-)
When in doubt, follow the money ...
https://fcpp.org/2019/02/07/lets-do-follow-the-climate-money/
Doesn't address the fact that every decade you chicken-little nutcases conjure up another hysterical claim that the world will end in the coming decades.
course the world will not end, but people will die for real, because of all the ignorant assholes who don't care ...
Serial doomcasting. Changing the goalposts. Somebody is always
changing the goalposts. Talk about a little boy crying wolf.
Climate Change "is" happening. The scientific proof "is" there ... it's not just a theory or a bible-humping group calling for the end of the world.
But maybe Trump will manage to make it all a moot question by creating a nuclear anarchy in the Middle East...
warmingDoesn't address the fact that every decade you
chicken-little nutcases conjure up another hysterical
claim that the world will end in the coming decades.
some people are just too dumb to get it. scientist predicting global
for decades. nobody did anything about it. now the forrest burning seasons are longer than ever, the arctic sea-ice melt is accelerating, the climate has changed for real and you are blabbering about your alternative facts. of course the world will not end, but people will die for real, because of all the ignorant assholes who don't care ...
notDoesn't address the fact that every decade you chicken-little nutcases
conjure up another hysterical claim that the world will end in the
coming decades.
Climate Change "is" happening. The scientific proof "is" there ... it's
just a theory or a bible-humping group calling for the end of the world.
"Science", Nick, not just some "chicken-little nutcases" but thousands of the world's finest and most learned.
The climates are changing, we just don't know the rate yet and whether it will be real-bad, bad-bad or just bad ... one thing is certain: it's not going to be good.
The world will end, one day, not because of the climate but because thesun
will end in a super-nova.
Our species will vanish before that, we just don't know "when" ...
This decade? This century? This millenium? More?
But unarrested man-made climate change has the potential of speeding thatup
by a factor as yet unknown.
Climate change is not a religion one subscribes to or not. It is a fact,it
is happening...
But maybe Trump will manage to make it all a moot question by creating a nuclear anarchy in the Middle East...
.... Long after we're dead, either from nuking ourselves to oblivion
or the
sun burns out or the oceans drown us all, the earth as a planet will still be
around long after. With its climate changing.
But that is a long time in the future. Problems like climate change matter here and now. Yes, you are entitled not to care about it. But don't complai that other people do. After all, they'll have to compensate for those like who don't. ;)
Its really climate-hysteria I complain about, and how
hysterics and nutcases always seem to claim the world
will end in a decade. And when it doesn't? Another
different climate-hysteria is conjured up to get
everyone in a panic.
Its really climate-hysteria I complain about, and how
hysterics and nutcases always seem to claim the world
will end in a decade. And when it doesn't? Another
different climate-hysteria is conjured up to get
everyone in a panic.
I wonder who these hysterics and nutcases are you are talking about? Some religious fanatics? I don't know any serious scientist that claims or claimed the world will end in a decade.
How should we call the people that pretend everything is fine? Delusional?
I wonder who these hysterics and nutcases are you are talking about? Some religious fanatics? I don't know any serious scientist that claims or claime the world will end in a decade.
How should we call the people that pretend everything is fine? Delusional?
Decaprio (I drive an eco-friendly vehicle... but flew first-class to be here), ...
I see you will not acknowledge the euphemism "climate change" and how
it can mean anything.
Gee, it was a degree warmer than last year... panic button! ;)
Its really climate-hysteria I complain about, and how hysterics and nutcases
always seem to claim the world will end in a decade. And when it
doesn't?
Read what I wrote elsewhere - I respect true environmentalists more
than
hysterics, because at least they do something to housekeep the
planet.
Warmer not only in front of your door, but on average, worldwide. With a cl trend that will probably continue. Maybe you would be more concerned if you could already see the sea from your door, or if you could see the bushfires
Now see, *THIS* is exactly the sort of nutjob doomsday nonsense I'm talking
about.
Seeing the sea from my door or bushfires based on a trend that
will
"probably" continue. LOL!!! Thanks for the laugh. Do you know where I live?
Which such climate-change disasters on the horizon, why bother
getting out of
bed to do anything? Our evil planet is just going to destroy us all anyway?
It must be exhausting to have that level of anxiety and worries. How
does it
feel to be contributing to Fidonet using a computer that was likely
made in a
polluting factory from non-recyclable components assembled with slave labour?
What exactly are you trying to say? Begging me to call you an irresponsible silly ass? I know you aren't. On the other hand, you don't know anything ab my life, my ecological footprint, my worries, or my computer (and it has nothing to do with what I wrote before, anyway). So come up with something better.
; climate-duped.
; Thanks Nick, couldn't have said it better myself. :-)
When in doubt, follow the money ...
hystericcourse the world will not end, but people will die for real, because of all
the ignorant assholes who don't care ...
I'd rather be an ignorant asshole who enjoys his life instead of a
who complains about something the planet does - with or without mankind's involvement - And looking up to big government to fix everything for me.
Hey Joey, can you say "ostrich"?
Seems like one of your worries is the planet, which will be here long after
we all make our departures.
Nope, my worries are about humans. However, not too accidentally these depe on the planet being in more or less the state it is in now. And if you recommend me to stay in bed for not causing any trouble to the planet, I'll take your reasoning above (we'll all be departed in some future) to ask you why you don't depart just now.
Nick Andre wrote to Gerrit Kuehn <=-depe
On 11 Jan 20 10:19:14, Gerrit Kuehn said the following to Nick
Andre:
Nope, my worries are about humans. However, not too accidentally these
on the planet being in more or less the state it is in now. And if you recommend me to stay in bed for not causing any trouble to the planet,I'll
take your reasoning above (we'll all be departed in some future) to askyou
why you don't depart just now.
Yawn.
Yawn.
Yawn.
You beat me to it.
This guy's nearly as bad as the main troll.
Oli wrote to Dan Clough <=-
This guy's nearly as bad as the main troll.
How do you spot trolls in Fidonews?
They are the guys who constantly blabbering about trolls.
This guy's nearly as bad as the main troll.
stopbe long gone or moved on before anyone notices they've been
climate-duped.
Nick
Thanks Nick, couldn't have said it better myself. :-)
When in doubt, follow the money ...
The fact that someone is trying to make money out of something does not
that something from existing.
Hello David,
; climate-duped.
; Thanks Nick, couldn't have said it better myself. :-)
When is making money more important than people's lives?
California is burning. So is Australia.
How many animals > have been lost in those fires? Well over a billion.ÂAnd yet,
there are those who still claim climate change is all a hoax.
How do you spot trolls in Fidonews?
They are the guys who constantly blabbering about trolls.
I haven't posted in here in several months. Yet somehow you think
I'm "constantly blabbering" about trolls? Are you high on crack,
or drunk?
How do you spot trolls in Fidonews?
They are the guys who constantly blabbering about trolls.
On 11 Jan 20 18:51:17, Oli said the following to Dan Clough:
How do you spot trolls in Fidonews?
They are the guys who constantly blabbering about trolls.
Its amusing to me that you like to blabber on and insult me
while the host-system of your point address has enjoyed a direct connection with my system for quite some time... and is very
smiley-polite whenever he wants something. And oh how he just
can't wait to grab new ZC1 echoes I conjure up.
So every time he polls here, you are by close association,
kissing my ass. I get my ass kissed from a few others such as
yourself but theres something very special to me about having
your host directly supplying you my ass to kiss.
And he polls here several times a day...
Nick
And he polls here several times a day...
Nick
the ZC1 has spoken ...
David Drummond wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
There is always someone trying to cash in from a situation, be
that situation good or bad.
David Drummond wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
In the USA we call those people "Democrats".
be long gone or moved on before anyone notices they've been
climate-duped.
Nick
Thanks Nick, couldn't have said it better myself. :-)
When in doubt, follow the money ...
stopThe fact that someone is trying to make money out of something does not
that something from existing.
When is making money more important than people's lives?
From observing modern business I would suggest "always".
California is burning.ÿ So is Australia.
I have noticed that.
How many animals > have been lost in those fires?ÿ Well over a billion.ÿAnd yet,
there are those who still claim climate change is all a hoax.
Especially if someone is making a dollar from it.
There is always someone trying to cash in from a situation, be that situation good or bad.
There is always someone trying to cash in from a situation, be
that situation good or bad.
In the USA we call those people "Democrats".
Oh? Is Trump a Democrat?
Nick,
Doesn't address the fact that every decade you chicken-little nutcases conjure up another hysterical claim that the world will end in the
coming decades.
Climate Change "is" happening. The scientific proof "is" there ... it's WD>not just a theory or a bible-humping group calling for the end of the WD>world.
"Science", Nick, not just some "chicken-little nutcases" but thousands of WD>the world's finest and most learned.
The climates are changing, we just don't know the rate yet and whether it WD>will be real-bad, bad-bad or just bad ... one thing is certain: it's not WD>going to be good.
The world will end, one day, not because of the climate but because the WD>sun will end in a super-nova.
On 09 Jan 20 21:08:34, Gerrit Kuehn said the following to Nick Andre:
Warmer not only in front of your door, but on average, worldwide. With a
cl GK> trend that will probably continue. Maybe you would be more NA>concerned if you GK> could already see the sea from your door, or if you
could see the bushfires Now see, *THIS* is exactly the sort of nutjob NA>doomsday nonsense I'm talking about. Seeing the sea from my door or NA>bushfires based on a trend that will "probably" continue. LOL!!! Thanks
for the laugh. Do you know where I live? Which such climate-change NA>disasters on the horizon, why bother getting out of bed to do anything?
On 7/01/2020 13:40, 2203/2 wrote:
climate-duped.
Thanks Nick, couldn't have said it better myself. :-)
When in doubt, follow the money ...
The fact that someone is trying to make money out of something does not DD>stop that something from existing.
The `climate' of the Earth has changed many many times in its 4 BILLION yea history!
Next year that scientist (along with a few other `scientists') comes[...]
back and
says;...'well....its sort of hard to really tell anything from that
small of a
`study'.....we need to `study' a bit further.
I've largely given up trying to explain myself on this; its basic
science and
not falling for the hysteria-of-the-decade.
I've largely given up trying to explain myself on this; its
basic science and not falling for the hysteria-of-the-decade.
So what is your scientific qualification, and why are so many
scientists think it's about time to be concerned and take
action?
he has a degree in trolLOLogy and knows a lot about people. he did
studies which proof that 99.5% of all scientist are hysterical, because...
I've largely given up trying to explain myself on this; its basic science and
not falling for the hysteria-of-the-decade.
So what is your scientific qualification, and why are so many scientists th it's about time to be concerned and take action?
he has a degree in trolLOLogy and knows a lot about people. he did studies which proof that 99.5% of all scientist are hysterical, because they clearly distort the basic science that was found to be valid by the 0.1% scientists who are non-hysterical. so now we now that the climate research propagated b the fake media is bogus, because the scientist who are doing it are hysteric
he has a degree in trolLOLogy and knows a lot about people. he
did studies which proof that 99.5% of all scientist are
hysterical, because...
<bla-bla-bla>
Nick is a true friend who will do crazy things for you just
because he likes you. "You" as in not specifically yourself.
Will you fix climate-change the same way you want to fix Fidonet
by replacing all *C's?
So what is your scientific qualification, and why are so many
scientists thinking it's about time to be concerned and take action?
Scientists like princess Greta?
Will you fix climate-change the same way you want to fix Fidonet
by replacing all *C's?
you really think i'm that stupid, don't you?
Your first fail to answer a simple question. Ok, here is a hint:
Scientists usually hold an academic in degree the domain of science they received from a university.
So let's try this again: what is your scientific qualification?
Oli wrote to Gerrit Kuehn <=-
I've largely given up trying to explain myself on this; its
basic science and not falling for the hysteria-of-the-decade.
So what is your scientific qualification, and why are so many
scientists think it's about time to be concerned and take
action?
he has a degree in trolLOLogy and knows a lot about people. he
did studies which proof that 99.5% of all scientist are
hysterical, because they clearly distort the basic science that
was found to be valid by the 0.1% scientists who are
non-hysterical. so now we now that the climate research
propagated by the fake media is bogus, because the scientist who
are doing it are hysterical.
Oli wrote to Nick Andre <=-
Will you fix climate-change the same way you want to fix Fidonet
by replacing all *C's?
you really think i'm that stupid, don't you?
So let's try this again: what is your scientific qualification?
What's yours?
He has expressed an opinion,
So I ask you for the third time: what is your scientific qualification?
Can you say "George Soros" and "AlGore"? How about "shareholders
of 'green energy' companies"?
Nick Andre wrote to Dan Clough <=-
On 18 Jan 20 13:43:00, Dan Clough said the following to Oli:
Can you say "George Soros" and "AlGore"? How about "shareholders
of 'green energy' companies"?
In the words of princess Greta - "How dare you?"
Nick is a true friend who will do crazy things for you just because he likes you. "You" as in not specifically yourself.
He has expressed an opinion, and while I do not share that opinion, we have no problem remaining friends. Interesting concept, try it once.
So I ask you for the third time: what is your scientific
qualification?
Qualified enough to spot your inherent comprehension problem.
You can
have
a degree in something but that does not necessarily mean you know everything
on the subject. That is an authoritarian response to assume that a
degree
proves absolute knowledge or even qualification.
I have met people and have extended family-connection with those who
are
extremely high functioning with university degrees and
"qualification" in your
view, but they cannot parallel-park their car or spot a Microsoft
scam or
cook a meal to feed themselves if their life depended on it. They can score
high on IQ testing but can fuck up a simple cup of coffee.
You assume that I must believe and recognize your definition of
authority or
qualification.
That I must believe that a scientist can never be paid
by
corporations or persuaded by politicians to do studies biased in
their
favour. To believe without question that climate science is never
wrong?
I then asked for your scientific qualification. You said, "Doesn't matter".
Thats why you're being rediculed. I'm consistant with what I believe
in,
you're busy moving the football goal-posts to wherever your belief
takes you.
That's how science works: people making extraordinary claims need to
proof them.
You failed thrice with this simple question now. I somehow expected that.
That's how science works: people making extraordinary claims need to
proof them.
And replicate them ... One-hit wonders are not science.
I've largely given up trying to explain myself on this; its
basic science and not falling for the hysteria-of-the-decade.
So what is your scientific qualification, and why are so many
scientists think it's about time to be concerned and take
action?
he has a degree in trolLOLogy and knows a lot about people. he did studies which proof that 99.5% of all scientist are hysterical, because they clearly distort the basic science that was found to be valid by the 0.1% scientists who are non-hysterical. so now we now that the climate research propagated by the fake media is bogus, because the scientist who are doing it are hysterical.
likeshe has a degree in trolLOLogy and knows a lot about people. he did
studies which proof that 99.5% of all scientist are hysterical,
because...
<bla-bla-bla>
Nick is a true friend who will do crazy things for you just because he
you. "You" as in not specifically yourself.have
He has expressed an opinion, and while I do not share that opinion, we
no problem remaining friends. Interesting concept, try it once.
At one point from my American friends I learned that opinions are like an arse-hole ... everybody has one.
I think his opinion is wrong, but it's his opinion, not mine.
You could also tell him "Go get a life", but as it turns-out, that's just what he's trying to accomplish.
Enjoy the week-end,
I've largely given up trying to explain myself on this; its basic
science and
not falling for the hysteria-of-the-decade.
So what is your scientific qualification, and why are so many scientiststh
it's about time to be concerned and take action?
Scientists like princess Greta?
he has a degree in trolLOLogy and knows a lot about people. he
did studies which proof that 99.5% of all scientist are
hysterical, because...
<bla-bla-bla>
exactly, it's a lot of bla bla bla in this echo ...
Nick is a true friend who will do crazy things for you just
because he likes you. "You" as in not specifically yourself.
you mean as in specifically yourself. the two zone clowns as BFFs, how romantic ...
So what is your scientific qualification, and why are so many
scientists thinking it's about time to be concerned and take action?
Scientists like princess Greta?
Your first fail to answer a simple question. Ok, here is a hint: Scientists usually hold an academic in degree the domain of science they received from a university.
So let's try this again: what is your scientific qualification?
Your first fail to answer a simple question. Ok, here is a hint:
Scientists usually hold an academic in degree the domain of science they
received from a university.
"Bla-bla-bla" ... and the planet's climate has changed since inception.
So let's try this again: what is your scientific qualification?
What's yours?
theHe has expressed an opinion,
Nope. He did not "express" an opinion. He is continuously advertising his opinion as the only sensible truth in the world to anyone around, along
way trying ridiculing everyone not sharing it.
Will you fix climate-change the same way you want to fix Fidonet
by replacing all *C's?
you really think i'm that stupid, don't you?
Well, I can't speak for Nick, but as for myself... "YES".
I'd like to remind you that you are supposed to use your full real
name when posting in Fidonet echos. Please remedy that.
everythingSo I ask you for the third time: what is your scientific qualification?
Qualified enough to spot your inherent comprehension problem. You can have a degree in something but that does not necessarily mean you know
on the subject. That is an authoritarian response to assume that a degree proves absolute knowledge or even qualification.a
Just like its an authoritarian response to hide behind religion and bible quotes when asked about gay marriage or abortion. The person doesn't give
logical answer, just one that aligns with their belief that God isabsolute.
I have met people and have extended family-connection with those who are extremely high functioning with university degrees and "qualification" in yourscore
view, but they cannot parallel-park their car or spot a Microsoft scam or cook a meal to feed themselves if their life depended on it. They can
high on IQ testing but can fuck up a simple cup of coffee.or
You assume that I must believe and recognize your definition of authority
qualification. That I must believe that a scientist can never be paid by corporations or persuaded by politicians to do studies biased in their favour. To believe without question that climate science is never wrong?matter".
I then asked for your scientific qualification. You said, "Doesn't
Thats why you're being rediculed. I'm consistant with what I believe in, you're busy moving the football goal-posts to wherever your belief takes you.
So let's try this again: what is your scientific qualification?
What's yours?
Anwering a question with a question is not an answer.
By your answer, as stated above, you are a nihilist.
And replicate them ... One-hit wonders are not science.
Oh I don't know about that. One-hit wonders in rock music ARE a science.
Which is why you have no idea as to what you are talking about.
Why is it wrong? Many people believe the same as Nick.
MichaelAnd replicate them ... One-hit wonders are not science.
Oh I don't know about that. One-hit wonders in rock music ARE ascience.
Ahhh ... Rock Music ... you also have guys who never achieve anything
but are lauded by the press for ... for ... for what ?   George
for example ... His contribution to music can be summed-up by going to
the urinals.
So let's try this again: what is your scientific qualification?
What's yours?
Anwering a question with a question is not an answer.
Sure it is. But it "doesn't matter" and the whole thread is getting boring.
By your answer, as stated above, you are a nihilist.
LOL, yet I live in your head rent-free and you worship and kiss my ass with >trollery just because of the Fido-hat I wear. You cannot help but write me >messages. I know I provide just enough entertainment for you until Bjorn
lays
off the sauce or has another disk-crash. Then suddenly.... you vanish.
Which is why you have no idea as to what you are talking about.
Gerrit Kuehn does not agree with you.
orWhy is it wrong? Many people believe the same as Nick.
Try reading the writings of Michiel van der Vlist once in a while, love'm
hate'm. He has mentioned time and again that "believing" is "not knowing", it is "accepting without proof", anything which science is not because if you "don't know" it "isn't science".
And replicate them ... One-hit wonders are not science.
Oh I don't know about that. One-hit wonders in rock music ARE a
science.
Ahhh ... Rock Music ... you also have guys who never achieve anything
but are lauded by the press for ... for ... for what ?ÿÿÿ George Michael
for example ... His contribution to music can be summed-up by going to
the urinals.
You have piped music at your urinals?
That's how science works: people making extraordinary claims need to
proof them.
And replicate them ... One-hit wonders are not science.
George Michael for example ... His contribution to music can be
summed-up by going to the urinals.
You have piped music at your urinals?
Sure it is. But it "doesn't matter" and the whole thread is getting boring
Do you believe in conspiracy theories? I am sure you do.
After all, climate denialism is, in itself, a conspiracy.
And that is what you have been claiming in this entire thread.
LOL, yet I live in your head rent-free and you worship and kiss my ass wit >trollery just because of the Fido-hat I wear. You cannot help but write me >messages. I know I provide just enough entertainment for you until Bjornlays
off the sauce or has another disk-crash. Then suddenly.... you vanish.
As you well know, nobody can ever Finnish the sauce ...
sauce.witLOL, yet I live in your head rent-free and you worship and kiss my ass
write metrollery just because of the Fido-hat I wear. You cannot help but
Bjornmessages. I know I provide just enough entertainment for you until
lays
off the sauce or has another disk-crash. Then suddenly.... you vanish.
As you well know, nobody can ever Finnish the sauce ...
You would be the expert on sauce, finishing the sauce, swallowing the
Sure it is. But it "doesn't matter" and the whole thread is getting
boring
Do you believe in conspiracy theories? I am sure you do.
After all, climate denialism is, in itself, a conspiracy.
And that is what you have been claiming in this entire thread.
Nope, try again Bjorn. I claimed climate *hysteria* is bullshit.
Hello TIM!
17 Jan 20 18:52, TIM RICHARDSON wrote to DAVID DRUMMOND:
[...]
Next year that scientist (along with a few other `scientists') comes
back and
says;...'well....its sort of hard to really tell anything from that
small of a
`study'.....we need to `study' a bit further.
[...]
Just take that opinion of yours about science to the science people you'll GK>meet during your next time in hospital. You may practice by not using any GK>technology created by scientists till then.
See you... not.
Hello Nick!
18 Jan 20 05:44, Nick Andre wrote to Tim Richardson:
I've largely given up trying to explain myself on this; its basic
science and
not falling for the hysteria-of-the-decade.
So what is your scientific qualification, and why are so many scientists GK>think it's about time to be concerned and take action?
Which is why you have no idea as to what you are talking about.
Gerrit Kuehn does not agree with you.
Why is it wrong? Many people believe the same as Nick.
Try reading the writings of Michiel van der Vlist once in a while, love'm WD>or hate'm. He has mentioned time and again that "believing" is "not WD>knowing", it is "accepting without proof", anything which science is not WD>because if you "don't know" it "isn't science".
You failed thrice with this simple question now. I somehow expected
that.
You also failed thrice to answer the same question, other than with "doesn't matter".
Nutjobs who want to feel good and still enjoy their Starbucks, Nike shoes, Apple phones, big SUV etc.
Ahhh ... Rock Music ... you also have guys who never achieve anything
but are lauded by the press for ... for ... for what ?
Just take that opinion of yours about science to the science people
you'll meet during your next time in hospital. You may practice by not
using any technology created by scientists till then.
You don't have to be a `scientist' in a hospital to know when you're being scammed.
You don't have to be a `scientist' to know that, in the
4-point-something
billion-year existance of the planet Earth. the climate has been `changing'
throughout that entire time.
The species MAN hasn't been in existence as an organized civilization long
enough to really have a realistic timeline of climate change
world-wide.
The thing I learned when this whole thing about `global warming'
started up
was; follow the money!
What were Al gore's qualifications?
What are Greta Thunberg's qualifications?
case. However, I can just explain things to you, I cannot understand them f you. If you insist behaving like a crackpot, that's all your decision. Just don't expect me or any other human being able to think outisde the little b
I'd like to remind you that you are supposed to use your full real
name when posting in Fidonet echos. Please remedy that.
... Post may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive persons.
I'd like to remind you that you are supposed to use your full
real name when posting in Fidonet echos. Please remedy that.
First, you are not the moderator of this FidoNet EchoMail area.
Second,
Third,
It must be boring to be you.
Entertain yourself by inventing another
thing to troll me over.
I do have German family heritage.
You're way less important than you think. You may come back to me if you're interested in actually discussing something. You can certainly continue
LOL if I'm so unimportant, why do you insist on replying?
LOL if I'm so unimportant, why do you insist on replying?
I pity you. But I won't continue this, looks like that'll be better for you blood pressure, anyway.
I do have German family heritage.
Who hasn't?
Do you think they left for a reason?
I do have German family heritage.
Who hasn't?
Do you think they left for a reason?
Me and 98% of the world's population :)
Sure? Can you look back 5 generations or more in your ancestry?
Anyway, my actual point here was that German heritage isn't exactly uncommo for me (although most of my family moved here only 3 generations ago), so whatever Nick was trying to say here, I'm not really impressed.
Sure? Can you look back 5 generations or more in your ancestry?
Anyway, my actual point here was that German heritage isn't exactly uncommon for me (although most of my family moved here only 3
generations ago), so whatever Nick was trying to say here, I'm not
really impressed.
Anyway, my actual point here was that German heritage isn't exactly
uncommon for me (although most of my family moved here only 3
generations ago), so whatever Nick was trying to say here, I'm not
really impressed.
Then you should have asked him what he implied.
White noise doen't help to fix the effects of climate change, it just confuses
people and nothing happens.
Voters are concerned about climate change until an election then they
are more
concerned about money in their pocket and jobs, their health etc.
On 01-09-20, NICK ANDRE said to GERRIT KUEHN:
Probably back so long ago Humankind has no memory of it.
| Sysop: | Weed Hopper |
|---|---|
| Location: | Clearwater, FL |
| Users: | 12 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 15:54:04 |
| Calls: | 67 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 50,165 |
| D/L today: |
95 files (9,997K bytes) |
| Messages: | 279,634 |