It's hard to forget that this actually is the president of the United States of America performing like that...
Bjorn Felten wrote to All <=-
Both the above searches gives interesting results. Especially if you
chose Video in the top Google menu. Quite entertaining.
It's hard to forget that this actually is the president of the
United States of America performing like that...
It's hard to forget that this actually is the president of the
United States of America performing like that...
Both the above searches gives interesting results. Especially if you
chose Video in the top Google menu. Quite entertaining.
It's hard to forget that this actually is the president of the
United States of America performing like that...
Bjorn Felten wrote to All <=-
Both the above searches gives interesting results. Especially if
you chose Video in the top Google menu. Quite entertaining.
It's hard to forget that this actually is the president of the
United States of America performing like that...
Many of us have been waiting for this very thing. Obama's blatant corruption is beginning to show its head.
Daniel Traechin
Mike Miller wrote to Daniel <=-
Even the Senate Republicans think Trump is wacky over this "Obamagate" bullshit.
Trump is a damn embarassment.
Mike Miller wrote to Bjorn Felten <=-
Hello Bjorn!
12 May 20 23:40, you wrote to all:
Both the above searches gives interesting results. Especially if you
chose Video in the top Google menu. Quite entertaining.
It's hard to forget that this actually is the president of the
United States of America performing like that...
it's damn embarassing is what it is. And people STILL think he's a "stable genius" and "the smartest president we've ever had"
It's hard to forget that this actually is the president of the
United States of America performing like that...
So you haven't seen the news but saw fit to comment anyway. It's a typical tactic of the left to attempt devalidating a situation by expressing how 'others' may be reacting to it. It is a premise based on a fallacy. It really shows that you lack the basis to make a point or lack a substantive opinion. If you gave me that, it would be met with respect.
So you haven't seen the news
it's damn embarassing is what it is. And people STILL think he's a "stable genius" and "the smartest president we've ever had"
 it's damn embarassing is what it is. And people STILL think he's a "stable genius" and "the smartest president we've ever had"
Ofcourse declaring everything one does not like "Fake New", meets your standard of respect.
Daniel wrote to Mike Miller <=-
So you haven't seen the news but saw fit to comment anyway. It's a
typical tactic of the left to attempt devalidating a situation by expressing how 'others' may be reacting to it. It is a premise based on
a fallacy. It really shows that you lack the basis to make a point or
lack a substantive opinion.
Ofcourse declaring everything one does not like "Fake New", meets your
standard of respect.
There's so many things that surprise me about how this fool could be elected
to the highest office in USA. Most of all that they obviously don't have a test even remotely like the test to become a US citizen.
Doesn't he even know that everything he writes on Twitter is registered as an official document and later on can be requested as per the Freedom of Information Act?
He spends more time on twitter while watching Fox News than in the oval office. Now there's a through of historical information to write masters theses from for decades.
What a critter. If the world will ever remember a POTUS for centuries to come, it sure as hell will be Donald J. Trump. Not for very good reasons, though...
Ofcourse declaring everything one does not like "Fake New", meets
your standard of respect.
There's so many things that surprise me about how this fool could be elected to the highest office in USA. Most of all that they obviously
don't have a test even remotely like the test to become a US citizen.
Kees van Eeten wrote to Daniel <=-
Hello Daniel!
14 May 20 06:31, you wrote to Mike Miller:
So you haven't seen the news but saw fit to comment anyway. It's a typical tactic of the left to attempt devalidating a situation by expressing how 'others' may be reacting to it. It is a premise based on a fallacy. It really shows that you lack the basis to make a point or lack a substantive opinion. If you gave me that, it would be met with respect.
Ofcourse declaring everything one does not like "Fake New", meets your standard of respect.
Bjorn Felten wrote to Daniel <=-
So you haven't seen the news
Did you?
Q: Why is it so important to you to make this a global competition?
A: Ask China.
This to an Asian-American female reporter. I don't understand why
China (as an entity, do you have a name and an address?) should have
the answer to that question.
Q: What crime are you accusing Obama of?
A: OBAMAGATE!
What type of crime is that actually, and how does US law define it?
Kurt Weiske wrote to Daniel <=-
Daniel wrote to Mike Miller <=-
So you haven't seen the news but saw fit to comment anyway. It's a
typical tactic of the left to attempt devalidating a situation by expressing how 'others' may be reacting to it. It is a premise based on
a fallacy. It really shows that you lack the basis to make a point or
lack a substantive opinion.
Why do you think that's a tactic limited to the political left?
Daniel wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
But I can see you agree with me, so that's good.
it's damn embarassing is what it is. And people STILL think
he's a "stable genius" and "the smartest president we've ever
had"
One thing is for sure: you guys will have a heck of a time trying
to repair all the foreign policy damages he's done in just e few
years.
a) Alienating and insulting most old allies while kissing up with dictators in Russia and North Korea.
b) Trashing a lot of international treaties.
c) Setting up high tariffs -- because the stupid SOB thinks that
it's the other country that has to pay for it, rather than your own citizens.
It took 4 years or so to dig out from Bush's idiocy. I'm thinking its going to take 16 to dig out from this...
Even the Senate Republicans think Trump is wacky over this "Obamagate"
bullshit.
So you haven't seen the news but saw fit to comment anyway. It's a typical tactic of the left to attempt devalidating a situation by expressing how 'others' may be reacting to it. It is a premise based on a fallacy. It really
shows that you lack the basis to make a point or lack a substantive opinion.
If you gave me that, it would be met with respect.
Trump is a damn embarassment.
Instead I got vitriol.
Daniel Traechin
What amazes me with the US that they come up with weird candidates ... Trump against Hillary, Trump against Biden ... there must be better
people hiding somewhere. In the past Romney, GWB, Goldwater, McCain, ... OK, GWB made it but how can you vote for such people?
It took 4 years or so to dig out from Bush's idiocy. I'm thinking its
going to take 16 to dig out from this...
Assuming that you can start directly next year and don't have to wait another Trump term, because that will totally destroy USA.
What a pity.
USA was actually on the way to become great again, thanks to the Obama administration. And the rest of the world was there for the ride.
it's damn embarassing is what it is. And people STILL think
he's a "stable genius" and "the smartest president we've ever
had"
One thing is for sure: you guys will have a heck of a time trying
to repair all the foreign policy damages he's done in just e few
years.
a) Alienating and insulting most old allies while kissing up with
dictators in Russia and North Korea.
b) Trashing a lot of international treaties.
c) Setting up high tariffs -- because the stupid SOB thinks that
it's the other country that has to pay for it, rather than your own
citizens.
It took 4 years or so to dig out from Bush's idiocy. I'm thinking its going
to take 16 to dig out from this...
Do you still have that old beat-up camper available for homeless
visitors from across the pond?
Ofcourse declaring everything one does not like "Fake New", meets
your standard of respect.
There's so many things that surprise me about how this fool could be
elected to the highest office in USA. Most of all that they obviously
don't have a test even remotely like the test to become a US citizen.
I've spent a fair portion of my life in the US and I do understand how he got elected.
Everybody in Europe figured Hillary would have an easy victory but in 2016 I
was in the US first week of June through somewhere in September. Upon my arrival home I said it was not a run race and Trump stood a fair chance. I may have mentioned it in Fidonet as well.
The reason is simple ... people were looking for something else than traditional politics ... Hillary was the symbol of that. The alternative was Trump.
GOP-voters are pretty stable, they'll vote Republican anyway.
The difference was made by Democrats, probably Bernie Sanders people, who figured they'd vote against Hillary but didn't realize there was only one other option.
Voting away from traditinal politics happened in other places too ... Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, the Netherlands barely kept its traditional majority.
What amazes me with the US that they come up with weird candidates ...
Trump against Hillary,
Trump against Biden ...
there must be better people hiding somewhere.
In the past Romney,
GWB,
Goldwater,
McCain,
... OK, GWB made it
but how can you vote for such people?
From a European perspective Trump has already made himself un-electable, but
come November the GOP will unite, the military is strongly GOP, the mormon church is GOP and there are enough braindead farts to pull it off again anyway.
Also, do not forget, the November elections are about more than the presidency.
It's also part of the Senate, the House, Governors, more local people.
If the Dems win the Senate too but Trump gets elected anyway, which is not all that unlikely, then his 2nd term will become dead meat.
Question is: where lies the power?
And where do people think the power lies?
Governors have a bigger say than we think here and even GOP-governors don't
eat out of Trump's hand.
Just to say ... interesting times lie ahead.
Would government regulation of social media solve this problem?
Should government regulate what companies such as Twitter, Facebook,
and others can and cannot do?
| Sysop: | Weed Hopper |
|---|---|
| Location: | Clearwater, FL |
| Users: | 14 |
| Nodes: | 6 (1 / 5) |
| Uptime: | 236:04:56 |
| Calls: | 55 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 50,128 |
| D/L today: |
51 files (8,523K bytes) |
| Messages: | 275,445 |