Does anyone know if the above ever got off the ground or any type of automatic point config currently exists in any form for any of the systems out there?

Thanks


--- InterEcho 1.21
* Origin: Home Of InterMail/InterEcho (1:106/201)

Hello Dale,

On Thursday October 22 2020 08:42, you wrote to All:

Does anyone know if the above ever got off the ground or any type of automatic point config currently exists in any form for any of the
systems out there?

Search the nodelist for the CDP user flag.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)

Hello Dale!

*** Thursday 22.10.20 at 08:42, Dale Barnes wrote to All:

Does anyone know if the above ever got off the ground

Yes it did and, from memory, I think it only ever gained some sort of popularity in R24.

Regards,
Martin

--- OpenXP 5.0.47
* Origin: Bitz-Box - Bradford - UK (2:310/31.3)

Hello, Michiel!

Thursday October 22 2020 16:17, from Michiel van der Vlist -> Dale Barnes:

Does anyone know if the above ever got off the ground or any type
of automatic point config currently exists in any form for any of
the systems out there?

The question is if there a PoC (Prove of Concept) implementation of this standard and anybody really uses it?

Search the nodelist for the CDP user flag.

Another interesting approach the author of a popular Android FTN app called HotDogEd took is a new REST API with some XML scheme for a point request, refer to the doc here http://hotdoged.propush.ru/docs

Best Regards, Nil
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
* Origin: -=NIL BBS=- (2:5015/46)

Hello Nil,

On Friday October 23 2020 21:20, you wrote to me:

Does anyone know if the above ever got off the ground or any
type of automatic point config currently exists in any form for
any of the systems out there?

The question is if there a PoC (Prove of Concept) implementation of
this standard and anybody really uses it?

The answers are: yes and yes.

Search the nodelist for the CDP user flag.

But I do not know the details. That is why I suggested contacting the sysops that carry a CDP flag.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)

Re: FRL-1033.003 (Automatic config of points)
By: Dale Barnes to All on Thu Oct 22 2020 08:42 am

Does anyone know if the above ever got off the ground or any type of automat point config currently exists in any form for any of the systems out there?

Thanks

There was one Dale, used in Z2. Sadly, much to my and others disagreement, the flag was removed due to 'insufficient use' and some feeling a flag for a bossnode of such software, was inappropriate as they 'weren't nodes'.

xxcarol
--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32
* Origin: SHENK'S EXPRESS telnet://shenks.synchro.net (1:275/100)

Re: FRL-1033.003 (Automatic config of points)
By: Michiel van der Vlist to Nil Alexandrov on Sat Oct 24 2020 12:00 am

Hello Nil,

On Friday October 23 2020 21:20, you wrote to me:

Does anyone know if the above ever got off the ground or any
type of automatic point config currently exists in any form for
any of the systems out there?

The question is if there a PoC (Prove of Concept) implementation of this standard and anybody really uses it?

The answers are: yes and yes.

Search the nodelist for the CDP user flag.

But I do not know the details. That is why I suggested contacting the sysops that carry a CDP flag.

Cheers, Michiel

Wasn't that the one that was voted to remove, over your and my objections? I didn't look to see if folks actually removed it. Ward could have extended it too as I think he was also in favor of it.

xxcarol
--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32
* Origin: SHENK'S EXPRESS telnet://shenks.synchro.net (1:275/100)

Hello Carol,

On Saturday October 31 2020 11:24, you wrote to me:

But I do not know the details. That is why I suggested contacting
the sysops that carry a CDP flag.

Wasn't that the one that was voted to remove, over your and my
objections?

Nope. There never was a vote about the flag. The flag is still in use and it is mentioned in FTS-5001.006

There /was/ a vote about promoting FSP-1016.001 to a standard. I voted in favour but the majority of the FTSC members rejected it. And so it ended up as FRL-1033.

Not every proposal makes it into a standard.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)

Re: FRL-1033.003 (Automatic config of points)
By: Michiel van der Vlist to Carol Shenkenberger on Sun Nov 01 2020 11:05 am

Hello Carol,

On Saturday October 31 2020 11:24, you wrote to me:

But I do not know the details. That is why I suggested contacting
the sysops that carry a CDP flag.

Wasn't that the one that was voted to remove, over your and my objections?

Nope. There never was a vote about the flag. The flag is still in use and it mentioned in FTS-5001.006

There /was/ a vote about promoting FSP-1016.001 to a standard. I voted in favour but the majority of the FTSC members rejected it. And so it ended up FRL-1033.

Not every proposal makes it into a standard.

Cheers, Michiel

Ah ok.

xxcarol
--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32
* Origin: SHENK'S EXPRESS telnet://shenks.synchro.net (1:275/100)