Since I am the n00b of the group, I am probably the only one who truly needs to step out there and campaign. I shot an email to Donald, asking for funds
and have not heard back from him - so a road trip to your states and countries
is not looking promising.
Pros
* I am a full-time programmer, developing Mailers, Tossers, BBS Doors, BBS software and Utilties 7 days a week.
Pros
* I am a full-time programmer, developing Mailers, Tossers, BBS
Doors, BBS software and Utilties 7 days a week.
The main goal of the FTSC is to document current practice. Practices
have a tendency to change over time so the documents need to keep up
with that.
That's a little different than developing software but probably just
as challenging.
One of my personal goals is to help make our specifications better organized for a new developer coming along... where to start? For example, FTS-0001 - part of it is not relative if your are a Socket developer. And if you read the specs from 1 forward, you do not find out about BinkP until you read the 10th specification (FTS-1026).
* I presented a before elections question on ASIAN_LINK - about developing a new roadmap document for developers who wish to implement spec(s). Was told to post it here... being a n00b to GoldEd, no idea if there is a cross-post keystroke. ;-)
GoldEd, no idea if there is a cross-post keystroke. ;-)
not a keystroke, no, but you can easily put
XC: echotag1, echotag2, echotag3
in the very first line of the message body listing the additional
echos the message will be posted in besides the one you are currently writing in... it works just like CCing netmails...
Re: Campaigning...
By: Ozz Nixon to Alan Ianson on Mon Feb 11 2019 04:17 pm
I like this idea. The current 'roadmaps' are very messy.
Ozz Nixon wrote to Carol Shenkenberger <=-
* * * All on a Dial-up * * *
I'm not trying to pooh-pooh anything you've done (and it's impressive to me the amount of stuff you've done, TBH). I'm just trying to see where everyone is going with the FTSC.
Innovation is a challenge with Fidonot - as I learned in the early 90's when I was developing as a contractor for Planet Connect - to help get
FIDO on the Satelite - so many ppl pooh-pood the idea. Making policy fit their argument, calling and leaving threatening voicemails, it is very
odd how some people in the peanut gallery get really uptight with change.
Kurt Weiske wrote to Sean Dennis <=-
As I understand it, the charter for the FTSC is to document current software and standards, and to promote new technologies within Fidonet. It's not necessarily up to them to *develop* for Fidonet but it's encouraging to see any and all new development for Fidonet.
Ozz Nixon wrote to Carol Shenkenberger <=-
I'm not trying to pooh-pooh anything you've done (and it's impressive
to me the amount of stuff you've done, TBH). I'm just trying to see
where everyone is going with the FTSC.
As I understand it, the charter for the FTSC is to document current software and standards, and to promote new technologies within
Fidonet. It's not necessarily up to them to *develop* for Fidonet but
it's encouraging to see any and all new development for Fidonet.
I don't think you understand how, in the grand scheme of
Fidonet-things, irrelevant Planet Connect was.
Ozz Nixon wrote to Carol Shenkenberger <=-
ON> * * * All on a Dial-up * * *
you know, Tinyfugue works great via a BBS too).
I'm not trying to pooh-pooh anything you've done (and it's impressive to
Ozz Nixon wrote to Ward Dossche <=-
went back to 1990. I leave here in 6 months - and I am
excited beyond belief - I will be moving to an area where I
can hit Atlanta in 2 and 1/2 hours - and I can get my
Ozz Nixon wrote to Ward Dossche <=-
I don't think you understand how, in the grand scheme of
Fidonet-things, irrelevant Planet Connect was.
Again, that blanket of a statement does not hold light to those who
lived in the dead-zones of the US.
Innovation is a challenge with Fidonot - as I learned in the early
90's when I was developing as a contractor for Planet Connect - to
help get FIDO on the Satelite - so many ppl pooh-pood the idea.
Making policy fit their argument, calling and leaving threatening
voicemails, it is very odd how some people in the peanut gallery get
really uptight with change.
I don't think you understand how, in the grand scheme of
Fidonet-things, irrelevant Planet Connect was.
Ozz Nixon wrote to Ward Dossche <=-
You'll be very close to me. I live about 30 minutes west of Johnson
City, Tennessee.
All I can get out here is DSL also but, honestly, I'm thinking of
putting a POTS line for the BBS in since it's more reliable.
I will be moving to an area where I can hit Atlanta in 2
and 1/2 hours - and I can get my technology fix! Yet, the city I am
moving to only has 1 provider capable of "DSL" speed.
on the contrary... Planet Connect helped to shed the artifical constrains put on operators as to where you can get your echomail feed from...
the main problem was *Cs and others telling everyone they had to pull echomail and files from their NC/NEC or assigned Hub...
Innovation is a challenge with Fidonot - as I learned in the early
90's when I was developing as a contractor for Planet Connect - to
I don't think you understand how, in the grand scheme of Fidonet-things, irrelevant Planet Connect was.
I don't think you understand how, in the grand scheme of
Fidonet-things, irrelevant Planet Connect was.
Again, that blanket of a statement does not hold light to those who
lived in the dead-zones of the US.
In the toll-bound USA of the '90s, it disrupted (in the proper sense of the word) the cost-recovery monopolies of the NECs who built billing systems around their echomail backbones and turned moving echomail into a business.
and 1/2 hours - and I can get my technology fix! Yet, the city I am
moving to only has 1 provider capable of "DSL" speed.
With the exception of Glacier National park and Yellowstone National Park I have no problem getting internet/WiFi/4G almost anywhere in Montana.
Talk about remote.
Meaning I don't buy your story.
Talk about remote.
Meaning I don't buy your story.
Actually he is right. National parks areas have coverage.
Talk about remote.
The northernmost province of Sweden, Lappland, makes up 20% of
Sweden's area. It has a population density of 0.8/km^2 mostly
concentrated to half a dozen villages. It has 98% coverage. That's remote too.
I don't think you understand how, in the grand scheme of
Fidonet-things, irrelevant Planet Connect was.
It was fairly significant in parts of the USA that I was in for a time.
I'm ot sure what footprint they had outside the USA.
on the contrary... Planet Connect helped to shed the artifical
constrains put on operators as to where you can get your echomail
feed from...
Do not confuse Z1 tribal warfare for what happened elsewhere in the world.
the main problem was *Cs and others telling everyone they had to pull
echomail and files from their NC/NEC or assigned Hub...
Again, that's Z1 tribal warfare. Has nothing to do with the on-goings
in the other zones.
With the exception of Glacier National park and Yellowstone National
Park I have no problem getting internet/WiFi/4G almost anywhere in
Montana.
Meaning I don't buy your story.
Now in Montana, since you think it has such great coverage:
Ozz,
Now in Montana, since you think it has such great coverage:
I'm not interested in a pissing-contest but I fear that when it
concerns situations in Montana, I'm better informed than you are.
The internet has served me well overthere the past 10 years ...
\%/@rd
--- D'Bridge 3.99 SR41
* Origin: Ceci n'est pas un courriel (2:292/854)
Meaning I don't buy your story.
Actually he is right. National parks areas have coverage.
You badly need to visit some national parks. I spend considerable time every year in Glacier and Yellowstone and 6 miles past the gate there isn't even cellphonce.
I don't think you understand how, in the grand scheme of
Fidonet-things, irrelevant Planet Connect was.
It was fairly significant in parts of the USA that I was in for a
time. I'm ot sure what footprint they had outside the USA.
I hope you have read "in the grand scheme of things".
Sysop: | Weed Hopper |
---|---|
Location: | Clearwater, FL |
Users: | 14 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 230:38:18 |
Calls: | 55 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 50,127 |
D/L today: |
26 files (3,281K bytes) |
Messages: | 275,350 |