The polls have closed in the FTSC Standing Member Election. 17 RCs from
3 Zones cast valid ballots. A total of 3 ballots were rejected -- 2 received after the polls closed and 1 from an ineligible voter.
The polls have closed in the FTSC Standing Member Election. 17 RCsfrom
3 Zones cast valid ballots. A total of 3 ballots were rejected -- 2 received after the polls closed and 1 from an ineligible voter.
Meaning an entire zone is missing in action ...
Meaning an entire zone is missing in action ...
Or at least chose not to participate in the election.
Ward Dossche wrote to Andrew Leary <=-
The polls have closed in the FTSC Standing Member Election. 17 RCs from
3 Zones cast valid ballots. A total of 3 ballots were rejected -- 2 received after the polls closed and 1 from an ineligible voter.
Meaning an entire zone is missing in action ...
Meaning an entire zone is missing in action ...
No, it doesn't mean that at all. The zone is there, they just
succumbed to apathy and did not participate.
Meaning an entire zone is missing in action ...
No, it doesn't mean that at all. The zone is there, they just
succumbed to apathy and did not participate.
As your knowledge and understanding re: the functioning of Fidonet's cogwheels >approaches zero, I can only confirm my initial statement ... an entire zone is
missing in action, not just during this election.
Ward Dossche wrote to Dan Clough <=-
No, it doesn't mean that at all. The zone is there, they just
succumbed to apathy and did not participate.
As your knowledge and understanding re: the functioning of
Fidonet's cogwheels approaches zero, I can only confirm my
initial statement ... an entire zone is missing in action, not
just during this election.
I can only confirm my initial statement ... an entire zone is
missing in action, not just during this election.
Strange... I still connect with 3 solid links in Z4. It is not a huge number of links, but even your own network is extremely small in number these days :)
Ozz Nixon - Not an RC/eligible voter
RC28 - Received after polls closed
RC57 - Received after polls closed
RC57 - Received after polls closed
Not Correct:
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 21:28:23 +1300
Message-ID: <10868$FTSC_PUBLIC@JamNNTPd>
X-JAM-From: Paul Hayton <3:770/100>
X-JAM-To: All
However, it will make no difference, as all candidates had well over
a majority of ballots cast anyway.
This message was missed, due to the incorrect addressee. If Paul
chooses to challenge this ballot's exclusion, I will certainly consider amending the results. However, it will make no difference, as all candidates had well over a majority of ballots cast anyway.
Ballots Rejected/Reason
-----------------------
RC28 - Received after polls closed
The period for contesting votes ends on Sunday, 10 March 2019 at 20:00 UTC.
Ballots Rejected/Reason
-----------------------
RC28 - Received after polls closed
The period for contesting votes ends on Sunday, 10 March 2019 at 20:00 UTC.
I object against going on record as having submitted a vote after the polls closed. The sysops of R28 decided to not participate in the election. My message was a statement to that effect. It was not a
vote. The intent of the statement was to avoid R28 being labelled as a region with no active RC or active sysops.
Your objection is noted. You did not submit a vote; I will note that
in the final results posting.
Your objection is noted. You did not submit a vote; I will note that
in the final results posting.
Joacim Melin wrote to Michiel van der Vlist <=-
Your objection is noted. You did not submit a vote; I will note that
in the final results posting.
Now we can move over to Fidonews and wait for the inevitable
arguing about the validity of the election. :)
Joacim Melin wrote to Michiel van der Vlist <=-
Your objection is noted. You did not submit a vote; I will note that
in the final results posting.
Now we can move over to Fidonews and wait for the inevitable
arguing about the validity of the election. :)
Yep, and ALL the bitching will be from the same 2-3 individuals,
as usual. :(
Now we can move over to Fidonews and wait for the inevitable arguing
about the validity of the election. :)
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Joacim Melin <=-
Now we can move over to Fidonews and wait for the inevitable arguing
about the validity of the election. :)
I will not contest the validity of the election. But there is a
reason R28 decided to not cast a vote. And it is not lazyness, indifference, apathy or inertia...
Your objection is noted. You did not submit a vote; I will note that AL>>>> in the final results posting.
Now we can move over to Fidonews and wait for the inevitable
arguing about the validity of the election. :)
Yep, and ALL the bitching will be from the same 2-3 individuals,
as usual. :(
I will not contest the validity of the election. But there is a
reason R28 decided to not cast a vote. And it is not lazyness,
indifference, apathy or inertia...
OK.... would you mind sharing what the reason *WAS*?
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I will not contest the validity of the election. But there is a
reason R28 decided to not cast a vote. And it is not lazyness,
indifference, apathy or inertia...
OK.... would you mind sharing what the reason *WAS*?
Not until after the final results are published via the official
Fidonet channels.
I will not contest the validity of the election. But there is a
reason R28 decided to not cast a vote. And it is not lazyness,
indifference, apathy or inertia...
OK.... would you mind sharing what the reason *WAS*?
Not until after the final results are published via the official Fidonet channels.
I will not contest the validity of the election. But there is a
reason R28 decided to not cast a vote. And it is not lazyness,
indifference, apathy or inertia...
OK.... would you mind sharing what the reason *WAS*?
Not until after the final results are published via the official
Fidonet channels.
OK..... how about now? Thanks!
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I will not contest the validity of the election. But there is a
reason R28 decided to not cast a vote. And it is not lazyness,
indifference, apathy or inertia...
OK.... would you mind sharing what the reason *WAS*?
Not until after the final results are published via the official
Fidonet channels.
OK..... how about now? Thanks!
The prime "official Fidonet channel" is Fidonews. I have not seen
the results published there...
Really? FidoNews is the "offical" channel for reporting of FTSC
election results? Not the FTSC echo itself, eh?
Well, OK. Assuming the results get published in the next FidoNews
(are you listening, Bjorn?), we can hope to hear from you then...
OK..... how about now? Thanks!
The prime "official Fidonet channel" is Fidonews. I have not
seen the results published there...
Really? FidoNews is the "offical" channel for reporting of FTSC
election results?
Not the FTSC echo itself, eh?
Ward Dossche wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Really? FidoNews is the "offical" channel for reporting of FTSC
election results? Not the FTSC echo itself, eh?
Fidonews is the only time-track throughout Fidonet's history that
is searchable.
If it didn't appear in Fidonews, it didn't happen.
Well, OK. Assuming the results get published in the next FidoNews
(are you listening, Bjorn?), we can hope to hear from you then...
The writing of such an article is not Bjorn's job.
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=-
OK..... how about now? Thanks!
The prime "official Fidonet channel" is Fidonews. I have not
seen the results published there...
Really? FidoNews is the "offical" channel for reporting of FTSC
election results?
Fidonews is the official channel for any Fidonet related
announcement.
Not the FTSC echo itself, eh?
Echomail is not covered by P4 according to the powers that be in
your neck of the woods.
So... How are you doing with moving forward to IPv6?
Fidonews is the only time-track throughout Fidonet's history that
is searchable.
Perhaps, but irrelevant to the question that was asked. Where is
it specified that FidoNews is the "official" channel for anything?
mark lewis wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Perhaps, but irrelevant to the question that was asked. Where is
it specified that FidoNews is the "official" channel for anything?
that would be policy... probably they are thinking about section
4.5 but there are other earlier sections that also speak of the
fidonews newsletter...
@MSGID: 2:292/854 0b072316
@REPLY: 792.fido_ftscpubl@1:123/115 20faecc1
Really? FidoNews is the "offical" channel for reporting of FTSC
election results? Not the FTSC echo itself, eh?
Fidonews is the only time-track throughout Fidonet's history that is searchable.
If it didn't appear in Fidonews, it didn't happen.
Well, OK. Assuming the results get published in the next FidoNews
(are you listening, Bjorn?), we can hope to hear from you then...
The writing of such an article is not Bjorn's job.
Fidonews is the official channel for any Fidonet related
announcement.
Would you mind telling me where that is specified?
The simple question is why did your Region choose not to vote in the[..]
FTSC election.
There's no reason you can't just tell me why you chose not to vote.
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Fidonews is the official channel for any Fidonet related
announcement.
Would you mind telling me where that is specified?
Yes, I mind.
The simple question is why did your Region choose not to vote in the
FTSC election.
[..]
There's no reason you can't just tell me why you chose not to vote.
No reason I can't but several reasons I won't. One of them is
that I do not enjoy arguing with you.
so perhaps you can tell us why after you see
that, as you said you would.
Fidonews is the official channel for any Fidonet related
announcement.
Would you mind telling me where that is specified?
Yes, I mind.
Yeah, I didn't think you could. That's because it *ISN'T*.
There's no reason you can't just tell me why you chose not to
vote.
No reason I can't but several reasons I won't. One of them is
that I do not enjoy arguing with you.
I don't enjoy arguing with you, either.
I see in another post that the election results should be in the
upcoming FidoNews, so perhaps you can tell us why after you see
that, as you said you would.
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I see in another post that the election results should be in the
upcoming FidoNews, so perhaps you can tell us why after you see
that, as you said you would.
I didn't say that.
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I didn't say that.
When I asked you when you would share the reason for not voting,
you said (paraphrasing from memory): "Not until after the results
are released in official channels". That certainly implies that
you *would* share after the official release.
Are you saying now that you are not going to tell the reason?
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Are you saying now that you are not going to tell the reason?
No, I am not saying that. What I am saying is that I did not say
when.
If you really were not in favor of some/all of the candidates,
wouldn't a "NO" vote have sent a better message, and perhaps had
an influence on the outcome?
So... How are you doing with moving forward to IPv6?
I'll answer that when you answer my question, and I'll do it promptly
with no further delaying tactics.
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=-
So... How are you doing with moving forward to IPv6?
I'll answer that when you answer my question, and I'll do it promptly
with no further delaying tactics.
So?
It's a subject that I know only the basics about, such as why it
is needed. Not sure if my options depend on what my internet
service provider offers, or what. I'll look into it, and am all
ears if you have some advice/info to offer.
I'm not doing well with that at all. In fact I have done nothing
with it.
It's a subject that I know only the basics about, such as why it
is needed. Not sure if my options depend on what my internet
service provider offers, or what. I'll look into it, and am all
ears if you have some advice/info to offer.
Hi Dan!
25 Mar 2019 08:03, from Dan Clough -> Michiel van der Vlist:
It's a subject that I know only the basics about, such as why it
is needed. Not sure if my options depend on what my internet
service provider offers, or what. I'll look into it, and am all
ears if you have some advice/info to offer.
You either have native support for it from your ISP (good!).
If not you can use a tunnel (not so good ;).
You can get a free tunnel from https://ipv6.he.net/
CU, Ricsi
You can get a free tunnel from https://ipv6.he.net/
CU, Ricsi
Where do I find the offer for a free tunnel?
I'm not doing well with that at all. In fact I have done nothing
with it.
So much for "moving forward"...
You can get a free tunnel from https://ipv6.he.net/ >>
CU, Ricsi
Where do I find the offer for a free tunnel?
https://tunnelbroker.net/
'Tommi
You either have native support for it from your ISP (good!).
If not you can use a tunnel (not so good ;).
You can get a free tunnel from https://ipv6.he.net/
Where do I find the offer for a free tunnel?
I can't get IPv6 at home yet.
@MSGID: 1:229/426 14ED0388
It would be nice if you would stop acting like such an insufferable jackass over your constant obsession with IPV6.[..]
--- Renegade vY2Ka2
Richard Menedetter wrote to Dan Clough <=-
It's a subject that I know only the basics about, such as why it
is needed. Not sure if my options depend on what my internet
service provider offers, or what. I'll look into it, and am all
ears if you have some advice/info to offer.
You either have native support for it from your ISP (good!).
If not you can use a tunnel (not so good ;).
You can get a free tunnel from https://ipv6.he.net/
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I'm not doing well with that at all. In fact I have done nothing
with it.
So much for "moving forward"...
It's a subject that I know only the basics about, such as why it
is needed. Not sure if my options depend on what my internet
service provider offers, or what. I'll look into it, and am all
ears if you have some advice/info to offer.
The first step would be to join us in the IPv6 echo. That is
where the expertise is. It is available at your uplink.
@MSGID: 1:229/426 14ED0388
No reply kludge...
It would be nice if you would stop acting like such an insufferable jackass over your constant obsession with IPV6.
No "next key" in Renegade?
I need focus away from the
immediate sensitivity the follows shaving my backside.
I need focus away from the
immediate sensitivity the follows shaving my backside.
You must have long arms.
I barely can find the time to shave my face -- why anyone would spend
his time shaving his backside is beyond me.
Real men have beards ... I never understood the concept of shaving ...
So much for "moving forward"...
Well, to be fair, I have never said a single word about "moving
forward" with IPv6.
I don't think the subject is extrememly relevant to the previous discussions in here about moving Fido forward.
It's not IPv4 which is hindering FidoNet in any way.
The first step would be to join us in the IPv6 echo. That is
where the expertise is. It is available at your uplink.
I'll inquire about it. Thanks.
You can get a free tunnel from https://ipv6.he.net/Thank you, Richard, for that info! I'll be checking things out, appreciate the reply.
I barely can find the time to shave my face -- why anyone wouldReal men have beards ... I never understood the concept of shaving ...
spend his time shaving his backside is beyond me.
I barely can find the time to shave my face -- why anyone would spend
his time shaving his backside is beyond me.
I need focus away from the
immediate sensitivity the follows shaving my backside.
You must have long arms.
I say Fidonet isn't going anywhere. it will remain the same until the last person leaving shuts off the light. Not to say that things can't *improve*, such as removing certain people in power who abuse that power or maybe merg all zones into one since it's pretty fucking silly to have all these zones, networks and whatnot as if Fidonet will suddenly grow to 20000 BBS:es again
Nick Andre wrote to Michiel Van Der Vlist <=-
Complaints about the Reply kludge, to
me is the same as the Spelling/Grammar/Nodelist Police or lacking a precious IPV6 address.
Yeah but sometimes its more fun hitting Reply. I need focus away from
the immediate sensitivity the follows shaving my backside.
Ward Dossche wrote to Nick Andre <=-
You must have long arms.
Bjorn Felten wrote to Ward Dossche <=-
-+- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE;
rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
Ward Dossche wrote to Bjorn Felten <=-
Real men have beards ... I never understood the concept of shaving ...
mark lewis wrote to Bjorn Felten <=-
i hear it is less painful than waxing... less costly, too -=B-)
Off-topic here, but for some reason, your origin line is being split
apart by something. I'm seeing it as this:
-+- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE;
rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
Just wanted to let you know.
i hear it is less painful than waxing... less costly, too -=B-)
Nick's Brazilian Ass Waxing?
2. Encouraging new technologies in Fidonet software development.
Promoting IPv6 is in line with that.
Richard Menedetter wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Tommi sent the direct link:
https://tunnelbroker.net/
There should be a link from ipv6.he.net to tunnelbroker ... but
it is easier to directly go to tb.net ;)
I have been promoting IPv6 in Fidonet for about a decade now. Not
because I felt a compelling need, but because I found it interesting
and I enjoyed exploring the technology. With moderate success.
Considering that there is a lot of inertia in Fidonet, 77 active nodes supporting IPv6 is not overwhelming, but it is not bad either.
Hi Dan!
25 Mar 2019 21:44, from Dan Clough -> Richard Menedetter:
RM>> You can get a free tunnel from https://ipv6.he.net/
You know, you're not allowed to question Fidolords though I am a grammar nazi.
"certain people in power who abuse that power" ...
In the summertime however I respect the wishes of previously my
beloved Anita and now still my children and grandchildren, who prefer to see what I really look like.
I updated my AAAA records for exchangeBBS... but, I do not have an
IPv6 enabled VPS environment...
Joacim,
"certain people in power who abuse that power" ...
Is that hypothetically speaking? Because if it isn't I would like you
to expand a bit on this. Like ... names perhaps ?
Take care,
I'd like to ask a question, without any preconceived opinions or otherwise: move Fidonet forward... where?
I mean, the network as such isn't exactly growing,
the technology is more or less based on the same stuff as 10-20 years
ago (which is fine by me)
the arguing and the politics are still the same as always.
I say Fidonet isn't going anywhere. it will remain the same until the
last person leaving shuts off the light.
Not to say that things can't *improve*, such as removing certain
people in power who abuse that power
or maybe merge all zones into one since it's pretty fucking
silly to have all these zones,
networks and whatnot as if Fidonet will suddenly grow to 20000 BBS:es again. If Fidonet is to stand a fighting chance to survive it needs
to be a friendlier place, a more accessible place. Have a look at how
easy you can join FSXNet, how welcoming that network is and how
friendly the atmosphere there are...
and compare it to this network who yells to every newcomer to get off
it's lawn.
So maybe I failed to not have opinions but I care deeply about this
stuff.
And no - I will not discuss this in Fidonews, which is the dung heap
of Fidonet.
I barely can find the time to shave my face -- why anyone would spend
his time shaving his backside is beyond me.
Real men have beards ...
I never understood the concept of shaving ...
I updated my AAAA records for exchangeBBS...
but, I do not have an IPv6 enabled VPS environment...
RM>> You can get a free tunnel from https://ipv6.he.net/Thanks, implemented... as far as I could. Waiting on a support call of
why I cannot enable IPv6 in the environment they provide.
If FSXnet is so great, why are you here?
You come storming in out of nowhere and DEMAND that we old farts who
have been here for over a quarter of a century CHANGE so that Fidonet becomes an alternet for FSXnet?
... Minus the obsessive focus on a buggy piece of BBS software ...
Minus the obsessive focus on a buggy piece of BBS software ...Whichone might that be ?
I updated my AAAA records for exchangeBBS...??? I do not understand.
but, I do not have an IPv6 enabled VPS environment...
VPS as in virtual private server?
Sysop: | Weed Hopper |
---|---|
Location: | Clearwater, FL |
Users: | 14 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 230:24:47 |
Calls: | 55 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 50,127 |
D/L today: |
25 files (2,916K bytes) |
Messages: | 275,347 |