In the pkt and msg headers, the fields cost and baud... are they still used anywhere? I know in a past coversation -- Nick shared with me costing can get complex - but do people still use costing, and why does it matter to the msg, and to the receiving system(s)?

Ozz

--
.. Ozz Nixon
... Author ExchangeBBS (suite)
.... Since 1983 BBS Developer

--- FMail-W32 2.0.1.4
* Origin: ExchangeBBS WHQ (1:275/362.0)

Good ${greeting_time}, Ozz!

26 Mar 2019 20:50:40, you wrote to All:

In the pkt and msg headers, the fields cost and baud... are they
still used anywhere?

No: these should be set to zero when creating the packet and not used when processing it.


--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-ccxxix-lxxix-xlii

... that's why I really dislike fools.
--- /bin/vi
* Origin: http://openwall.com/Owl (2:5020/545)

On 2019 Mar 26 20:50:40, you wrote to All:

In the pkt and msg headers, the fields cost and baud...

you should read FSP-1042 ;)

are they still used anywhere? I know in a past coversation -- Nick
shared with me costing can get complex - but do people still use
costing,

probably not...

and why does it matter to the msg, and to the receiving system(s)?

it doesn't matter to the receiving system... it matters to the sending system... storing this information in the message or packet allowed the system to have it handy when rescanning the outbound to qualify mail... the problem was that it wasn't zeroed out when the packet was sent... one reason for not zeroing it out was if the packet didn't go after being qualified, that information was lost...

in this day in time, cost is generally always zero...

)\/(ark

Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it wrong...
... I don't like violence, but I'm very good at it.
---
* Origin: (1:3634/12.73)