Hello!


This just heard in the FTSC_PUBLIC echo:

From: Deon George, 3:633/509
Date: 11/6/2019 8:38 PM

-----Beginning of the citation-----

While I actually like the technology and I think its pretty awesome what
was achieved back in the day - I'd like to see it progress taking
advantage of today's available technologies (while keeping the legacy
aspect of it). I also like the fact, that is kinda working alongside
today's world - without the invasion (of commerical ads, spam, etc).

As an example, I'm bringing back "videotex", but with ANSI, interBBS
capable, so that a "network of BBSes" can be logically one large BBS, but
still have its own personalisaiton on a part of it.

(If you know/knew videotex - it was "Interactive Teletex", "page" based
where pages were owned by service providers. I'm enabling BBSes to own a
page prefix, so if you connect to any videotex enabled BBS, you could see
all pages from that single location. I'm dont know if others will want to
use what I'm creating, but I'm having fun reliving it and creating it.)

----- The end of the citation -----


Later, George adds:

You can see it in action on my BBS telnet: //alterant.leenooks.net - you'll notice I'm running Synchronet, and when you get the option
change the shell to Ansitex.

Let's check it out!





../|ug

--- OpenXP 5.0.40
* Origin: /|ug's Point, Ont. CANADA (2:221/1.58)

Re: bringing back videotex
By: August Abolins to All on Fri Nov 08 2019 07:50 pm

You can see it in action on my BBS telnet: //alterant.leenooks.net - you'll notice I'm running Synchronet, and when you get the option
change the shell to Ansitex.

Let's check it out!

Hey, thanks for posting - you beat me to it.

Its at a point that somebody can join and be part of the InterBBS part of this - but its a little manual, so happy to help out by hand until I get it more automated. Theres a heap more features that can (need) to be added...

What does InterBBS mean? Well, if you run Synchronet too, you can install my shell and as frames are "published", they'll be sent to your board as well. Since Videotex (and thus Ansitex) is "page" (or "frame") based, as frames as submitted, they'll be sent to your BBS and available for viewing, and I'm doing
this via a FTN/Echomail area on a custom zone.

I'll happily accept help and ideas :)
...ëîåã

... Renegade Tagline!! We're tired of Being Kidnapped!!! REBEL!!!!!
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
* Origin: Alterant | An SBBS in Docker on Pi! (3:633/509)

Re: bringing back videotex
By: August Abolins to All on Fri Nov 08 2019 07:50 pm

Hello!

This just heard in the FTSC_PUBLIC echo:

From: Deon George, 3:633/509
Date: 11/6/2019 8:38 PM

-----Beginning of the citation-----

While I actually like the technology and I think its pretty awesome what
was achieved back in the day - I'd like to see it progress taking
advantage of today's available technologies (while keeping the legacy
aspect of it). I also like the fact, that is kinda working alongside
today's world - without the invasion (of commerical ads, spam, etc).

As an example, I'm bringing back "videotex", but with ANSI, interBBS capable, so that a "network of BBSes" can be logically one large BBS, but still have its own personalisaiton on a part of it.

(If you know/knew videotex - it was "Interactive Teletex", "page" based where pages were owned by service providers. I'm enabling BBSes to own a page prefix, so if you connect to any videotex enabled BBS, you could see all pages from that single location. I'm dont know if others will want to use what I'm creating, but I'm having fun reliving it and creating it.)

----- The end of the citation -----

Later, George adds:

You can see it in action on my BBS telnet: //alterant.leenooks.net - you'll notice I'm running Synchronet, and when you get the option change the shell to Ansitex.

Let's check it out!

../|ug

You know I had a website where the ORIGINAL videotex was being "brought back."
They had old videotapes with the original signals on them and were sampling..and re-sampling the signals to try to extract the original signal. With some success.

I'm from the era where I loved the idea of videotex but never had a chance to play with it...I'd love to see both the original and something approximating it
return. The old NAPALPS standard is an interesting study...very low bandwidth but vector based, quite similar to SVG.

...I've since lost that website where they were trying to exract the original videotex signals.

The AHK Gang! Live on Riot.im. When we feel like it.
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

Re: bringing back videotex
By: Chicken Head to August Abolins on Wed Nov 13 2019 06:00 pm

You know I had a website where the ORIGINAL videotex was being "brought back." They had old videotapes with the original signals on them and were sampling..and re-sampling the signals to try to extract the original signal. With some success.

I would love (and plan to) support the original frames. Well infact the US implemetnation was a bit different to that used in AU and the UK (and france too I think) - but nonetheless, I think the functionality was similiar.

You can see my original retro implementation on my website - http://alterant.leenooks.net - and look for OzTex. You can connect, and register/login, but there isnt much there in terms of frames. (If you press Connect and it disconnects, try a 2nd or 3rd time - I havent tracked down why this occurs yet). Going forward, I hope to load these frames into SBBS that would make a more stable system.

I have no original videotex frames - but if there are around, I would love to know.
...ëîåã

... When Eve arrived, this was no longer a man's world.
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
* Origin: Alterant | An SBBS in Docker on Pi! (3:633/509)