https://upstreamreviews.com/?p=3114
Re: https://upstreamreviews.com/?p=
By: John Dovey Firecat to All on Fri Feb 11 2022 08:03 am
https://upstreamreviews.com/?p=3114The writting was on the wall for a long time already.
Most publishers in the magazine market are politically loaded, in an explicit
way. A whole lot of the magazines listed in Diasurgical's Grinder only want
woke themes or only accept stories from authors with a woke background (stated
explictly). Of those who don't place a disclaimer, reading the magazines shows
they are biased to the woke too.
Nevertheless, my theory is that the market for a lot of magazines is the people
who are trying to get published by the magazine and who buy the magazines to do
research. I don't think the current distribution model of a lot of these magazines would be able to reach end-readers enough to sustain the publication
at all.
Anyway, aften the Baen fiasco, a lot of authors and _actual_ readers have gone
sour against the industry.
--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
Which Baen fiasco? You talking about after Jim died?
https://upstreamreviews.com/?p=3114
Re: https://upstreamreviews.com/?p=
By: John Dovey Firecat to Richard Falken on Fri Feb 11 2022 02:48 pm
Which Baen fiasco? You talking about after Jim died?No. Well, it was after Jim died, but I am not talking about Jim here.
Some guy started complaining in the Internets that the Baen forum had right-wingers on it, so a cancel campaign was initiated against Baen. As a result, they banned the head publisher from a convention and sent threatening
messages to Baen's hosting provider.
Having Toni Weisskopf banned from the DisCOn was not very popular and got a
lot of people angry.
Baen had to shut the forums down, move them to a new provider, and then reopen
them as a private service for verified customers only - so if you wanted to go
and troll inside, you had to purchase something.
--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
Hello John Dovey Firecat!
** On Friday 11.02.22 - 08:03, John Dovey Firecat wrote to All:
https://upstreamreviews.com/?p=3114Does that system just report sales based on POS at end-user
terminals? I don't subscribe to any POS analysis system. I am
sure that many independent shops don't either. So, many numbers
are not represented.
And.. some books (particulary mmpk) are "strippable", meaning
that the bookseller has the option to return unsold titles by
simply ripping the front covers off, mailing back the covers
and destroying the rest of the book. Does the BookScan system
reflect that scenario properly?
--
../|ug
Ok. *that* one. I thought you might be talking about the *Sad Puppies* episode...
Sysop: | Weed Hopper |
---|---|
Location: | Clearwater, FL |
Users: | 12 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 16:59:11 |
Calls: | 112 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 50,347 |
D/L today: |
518 files (497M bytes) |
Messages: | 296,795 |