I've heard this argument many times in the amateur radio
community and it is, frankly, kind of silly. Knowing Morse
code doesn't mean you actually know more about how radios
Its not about using morse code, as it is to know from where we've
started, knowing also the past and being respectful on what we have
today. Not just in communications but in many sort of things. :)
It was a metaphoric example ? if i am saying it right... not an actual fact :) it seems you know a lot about :)
For all the rest you said... i have to understand them first!
Ah, so homage to history? That's certainly important, thoughyep... a balance is sure needed. But i think right now, we are off-balanced by scraping all the "old-stuff". The son of a good friend is studying computer science in a local university, he is in his second half of the first year, and when i asked him what a byte/bit is, he couldn't answer. So i think some
I think sometimes we take it too far. Here in the US, in amateur
radio, one finds all these crusty old dudes tearing down the
newer hams over silly things: "Well, _I_ had to take a 20 WPM
code test to get MY extra license, but you're No-Code, so your
license doesn't mean as much as mine...." Stuff like that. It's
silly.
Sysop: | Weed Hopper |
---|---|
Location: | Clearwater, FL |
Users: | 12 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 17:27:07 |
Calls: | 114 |
Files: | 50,350 |
D/L today: |
57 files (9,999K bytes) |
Messages: | 297,811 |