Avon wrote to All <=-

* Are you happy with the way things are in fsxNet?

Yes!

* If you could change one thing what would it be?

I don't think that's anything that should change.

* If you could ensure one thing never changes in fsxNet what would it
be?

N/A

* Do you think creating extra echo areas infsxNet would be beneficial
or not, and why?

That's a good question. I have read all the posts related to
this topic sofar and I don't have a firm opinion on it, after
all, I'm relatively new here. :)

What I know is that I got used to "one echo" policy. Could I get
used to more echos? Yes, although I do not believe they are
necessary.

I really don't know much about DoorParty (have started to look
at the wiki because of all the discussions) but I must agree
that, if the message volume for this specific subject is really
big, then we should consider having a specific echo for that.
And period.

I really support separated echos for high-volume technical-related
discussions, and that's it. An echo for Pokemon-hunting would
be really hot for a few months in a row but would end after a
while. ;)

* Imagine you have access to between 2-4 more extra echo areas in
fsxNet - what should they be, and why?

I would support an separated echo for DoorParty, given the
discussion, and perhaps another one for testing (although
testing messages do not annoy me at all)

Thanks guys :)

fsxNET is forFun, Simple and eXperimental... We could well
eXperiment on another echo, keeping it simple and having
fun all the way :)



---
.-----________________--_ ________.--'-`--.____ Hugs from Flavio Bessa \____==================_) \_'===================' Syzo of Saturn's Orbit
- -|__|-.______|=====/ `---' Netmail 4:801/189.1
Live long ` ù._ _ _ _~~~~~| fcbessa@gmail.com
and prosper... `-.__________,' Always UnionNET Addicted!


... "Eu sou site do MMI! E voce?" -RL-

--- MultiMail/Darwin v0.49

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.11 (Windows)
* Origin: (21:1/146)