1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. SYNC SYSOPS

  • testing new rlogin.js -H

    From xbit@1:103/705 to All on Thursday, April 24, 2025 08:28:45
    Great update, working but one thing I noticed is my -s[TAG] no longer works with the -H. It does w/ -h. This is to be expected, yes?

    tested command lines:
    ?rlogin x-bit.org:5130 -h -s[777] -q -t xtrn=GW777
    ?rlogin x-bit.org:5130 -H -s[777] -q -t xtrn=GW777

    ...A face like a wedding cake left out in the rain..

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ |15<|07<|08< +h3 |02><|08-bi+ >|07>|15>
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Digital Man@1:103/705 to xbit on Thursday, April 24, 2025 12:58:32
    Re: testing new rlogin.js -H
    By: xbit to All on Thu Apr 24 2025 08:28 am

    Great update, working but one thing I noticed is my -s[TAG] no longer works with the -H. It does w/ -h. This is to be expected, yes?

    tested command lines:
    ?rlogin x-bit.org:5130 -h -s[777] -q -t xtrn=GW777
    ?rlogin x-bit.org:5130 -H -s[777] -q -t xtrn=GW777

    No, as long as the -s option is specified after -h or -H, it should work the same.
    --
    digital man (rob)

    Rush quote #58:
    Because for strangers and arrangers, constant change is here to stay
    Norco, CA WX: 65.0øF, 57.0% humidity, 4 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.24-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Digital Man@1:103/705 to xbit on Thursday, April 24, 2025 14:08:57
    Re: testing new rlogin.js -H
    By: Digital Man to xbit on Thu Apr 24 2025 12:58 pm

    Re: testing new rlogin.js -H
    By: xbit to All on Thu Apr 24 2025 08:28 am

    Great update, working but one thing I noticed is my -s[TAG] no longer works with the -H. It does w/ -h. This is to be expected, yes?

    tested command lines:
    ?rlogin x-bit.org:5130 -h -s[777] -q -t xtrn=GW777
    ?rlogin x-bit.org:5130 -H -s[777] -q -t xtrn=GW777

    No, as long as the -s option is specified after -h or -H, it should work the same.

    I see what's happening: the "password" field is *required* for the -H option (either -H<password> or -H <password>), so it's accepting "-s[777]" as the password. The whole point of -H (versus -h) is not use the user's password in the hash at all (so it can be changed later), so the sysop needs to provide a password on the command-line.
    --
    digital man (rob)

    Sling Blade quote #5:
    Karl Childers (to father): You ought not killed my little brother...
    Norco, CA WX: 66.9øF, 55.0% humidity, 2 mph W wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    --- SBBSecho 3.24-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)