I'll need to look back at my News server install which was ages ago but
I am wondering what to do for the HDD partitioning and what size to set things like home and var and temp and ?? and if to use LVM? or other stuff the installer offers.
There is a new 1TB HDD in the machine and I have a bootable Debian 10
USB I am using.
I'll need to look back at my News server install which was ages ago but I am wondering what to do for the HDD partitioning and what size to set things like home and var and temp and ?? and if to use LVM? or other stuff the installer offers.
I'll need to look back at my News server install which was ages ago but
I am wondering what to do for the HDD partitioning and what size to set things like home and var and temp and ?? and if to use LVM? or other stuff the installer offers.
OK some guidance please.
I am wondering what to do for the HDD partitioning and what size to set things like home and var and temp and ?? and if to use LVM? or other
So perhaps no more than 2GB for swap, probably why I had 1.9GB on the
old box :)
Yeah at this point I'm thinking
2GB for swap
300GB for var which allows for 200GB for Usenet and 100GB for other files.
Isn't swap meant to be something like half your onboard ram? So if I
have 8 gig I make a 4 gig swap partition? Or is that too much, or does
it depend on what stuff I am running say a NNTP server on top of BBS stuff?
So perhaps no more than 2GB for swap, probably why I had 1.9GB on the
old box :)
Black Panther wrote to Avon <=-
What I did here on the CRBBS system, which is running Debian 10, is set
up the 1tb drive into two partitions. One is 100gb, and that houses
root, os boot, var, etc. The other partition is the balance of the disk (minus 2 gb for swap), and that is my /home directory.
alterego wrote to Avon <=-
Back in the day when large drives where expensive and it wasnt uncommon
to have more than 1 hard drive in a machine, LVM was great to spread
data over drives and enable you to "resize" partitions if your initial configuration didnt meet the current size requirements.
dev dir type total avail used
/sda1 / ext4 19.5GB 6.8GB 11.7GB
/sda8 /home ext4 165.4GB 138.5GB 18.5GB
/sda6 /tmp ext4 1.9GB 1.8GB 3.0MB
/sda7 /var ext4 787.3GB 179.5GB 567.8GB
I'm a little late to the party, but why are you chopping up the hard
drive in the first place? Why not just use one big volume for root?
As for LVM, I'd do what zip suggested, it doesn't have much impact, and gives you the option later on of adding a hard drive to the filesystem.
I suppose if you're worried about running out of space due to some misbehaving application eating it all up, you might split it up..
If I LVM I guess I can always add another HDD if need be anyway to
offset any issues with storage running out.
I'll need to look back at my News server install which was ages ago
but I am wondering what to do for the HDD partitioning and what
size to set things like home and var and temp and ?? and if to use
LVM? or other stuff the installer offers.
There is a new 1TB HDD in the machine and I have a bootable Debian
10 USB I am using.
Then I could not get sudo to run for my normal login so googled and
added my name in to some sudo file then could not get nautalus to run
with elevated root like privs when I tried to sudo nautalus
Kinda over it now, so calling it quits for the night and will probably reformat the drive again and do another install.
Even though the installer was meant to be 'lite' it still installed the libre-office stuff which I also googled and found some info on how to remove for debian 9 that seemed to work for 10, although there were some icons that didn't go afterwards from the desktop etc.
Honestly it's not been exactly smooth so far but I will try again.
I downloaded the 3.4Gig DVD iso and ran the install process on that. Had the same issue with the graphics not working but ran the same fix I had from last time. The system still boots with some errors but it boots to the desktop (as before). Also had the same issue with not being able to run sudo occurred so again fixed that with a fix I found on google.
I can't seem to get my user account to run nautilus when I try to call it with sudo - it just fails to fire up. Google has yet to reveal a good
fix for this. I do want to be able to have root privs to do file stuff from time to time but ideally without to login as root to do it.
Tonight (it's coming up noon here Monday) I will try to install a fresh copy of Mystic and start to figure out the best way to migrate Agency across to it. I'm thinking it may be a bit of a PITA to do but changing some of dirs in the BBS at the same time. Will ponder some more.
Make sure you have the ISO that contains the Non-Free drivers. These can be found at: https://tinyurl.com/yxq8669h. Without the Non-Free or proprietary drivers, you can have all types of issues.
Also, when going through the setup, you'll get to a point where you enter your username and password. There is a place for you to enter a root password. If you don't set that password up, the install will not automatically set up sudo.
Hmmm, I don't use nautilus here, so I'm not sure how that works. I have only had to do that one, where I called caja with sudo. (I run MATE here) Otherwise, I do most everything from the command line.
One other thing to think of, is under Linux, Mystic will not be able to bind ports lower than 1024 (I think). You can run MIS using sudo, but
I've run into some issues where files were actually created as
root:root. What I did, is forward port 23 in my modem, to port 2300 to
my system. Then Mystic is set up to use port 2300, and no need for sudo. There are other ways around it, but that works quick and easy for me. :)
I can't seem to get my user account to run nautilus when I try to call
it with sudo - it just fails to fire up. Google has yet to reveal a
good fix for this. I do want to be able to have root privs to do file stuff from time to time but ideally without to login as root to do it.
Unless, of course, you mean a different nautilus besides the file
manager?
your having. Don't install the GUI, go straight console text mode.
Mystic dosn't need a gui. The new server doesn't either.
You will still be able to do things with the box.
Out of intrest, what is the model and make of the motherboard and video card?
Tonight (it's coming up noon here Monday) I will try to install a fresh copy of Mystic and start to figure out the best way to migrate Agency across to it. I'm thinking it may be a bit of a PITA to do but changing some of dirs in the BBS at the same time. Will ponder some more.
Today I copied over the windows BBS files and dropped them into a mirror on the Linux box. Then spent some time changing paths in config areas. Have not got to them all but making progress. Opted to merge down file dirs that I had different message nets in down to one main dir for
message files..
Trying to compile nodelists does not seem to work correctly. I think I have duff archive switches and perhaps the wrong zip or unzip installed. It seems to be a mix of Debian and InfoZip stuff... Mmmm
I expect a number of scripts will need to be looked at and I also need to test out other areas of the BBS too...
Not sure how I will tackle local doors yet but got to get files and messages working first and ensure menus look OK etc.
Then will come the tricky part of switching it over to live while some other stuff still runs on the windows system for now...
Sounds like what I'm working on. Deon talked me into giving Docker a try,and I'm working on getting all of the hub 4 config set up.
I had forgotten how
much of a pain it is to set up Husky config files... :)
Actually, I have the husky config setup and I think its way easier than the other BBS software that I've used (as a hub).
If that wasn't enough, I've been working on some MPL
programs. I'm a gluten for punishment, I guess... ;)
Gluten-free is better for your health.
Be a glutton for no gluten! <g>
That is a good time to get things straighted out. I have files separated by network, along with message bases. It makes it a bit easier.
much of a pain it is to set up Husky config files... :)
Actually, I have the husky config setup and I think its way easier than the other BBS software that I've used (as a hub).
A node now is somwhere between 3 and 6 lines:
Link:
Aka:
Password:
Flavour
Gluten-free is better for your health.
Be a glutton for no gluten! <g>
one thing I think that I will like (and Dan was doing) is setting all echomail and files per node to be tossed to a filebox. I think having aclear idea of files held per node is a good move. Having
stuff sat in echomail\out and not being easily clear on what is what is apain.
So when you are setup, I'll give you two scripts.
Outboxes (and inboxes I guess), are great for moving files around (like game packets) - but for normal "FTN" stuff, I prefer to use the normal
BSO structure that many supporting components use.
There seem to be several web walk through articles for this some more detailed than others. I found this one https://tinyurl.com/yxt6ylmp andthis other one https://tinyurl.com/yxfuwd2k which both want
me to use ssh and install xfce.
Do you think is a good idea / best instructs to follow?
I'm thinking of how best to quickly purge stuff held by a HUB for a nodethat is MIA and being delisted. A filebox for both echomail
and file areas seems like a good idea to me.
When you need to remove held packets etc. for a node how do you do it?
It's a balancing act as the more I change the more other files that ref the BBS need to change too.
But I think having all the message base JAM files in one dir and not separated by dirs based on networks is fine to do... certainly simplifies issues around having to change each base path manually when I can apply a global change to path and then move the JAM files over.
I think a number of ansi menus may be borked by case sensitivity issues also.
I also use "AutoPassive" with HPT, its sets to 28 days, which if this is mail in the queue for anode that is 28 days old, HPT automatically "pauses" the node (so no more exporting) - thus the filesystem doesnt
keep growing if you are not on top of it.
I'm wanting to be able to use VNC from my windows machine so I can
remote in to the Debian box and do admin stuff from within my home LAN.
I' not thinking this is something I want to be able to do from outside
the home.
There seem to be several web walk through articles for this some more detailed than others. I found this one https://tinyurl.com/yxt6ylmp and this other one https://tinyurl.com/yxfuwd2k which both want me to use
ssh and install xfce.
On 10-04-20 11:47, Avon wrote to alterego <=-
I'm wanting to be able to use VNC from my windows machine so I can
remote in to the Debian box and do admin stuff from within my home LAN.
I' not thinking this is something I want to be able to do from outside
the home.
I like the basic Gnome desktop that seems to come with debian but getting
a remote (working) VNC session that is reliable is a nightmare for a
n00b. At least with a raspberry pi they build in a VNC server into the OS... wish Debian did the same.
I'm wanting to be able to use VNC from my windows machine so I can
remote in to the Debian box and do admin stuff from within my home
LAN. I' not thinking this is something I want to be able to do from outside the home.
Do you think is a good idea / best instructs to follow?
VNC? Way overkill. I just use SSH. :)
Do you want to start a virtual (headless) X server or do you want to connect to
the desktop X server that is using the video card/monitor?
i dont have any graphical interface on my BBS raspberry. But if i would like to have a remote desktop, why not use Anydesk? https://anydesk.com/ It is free for privat use.
https://anydesk.com/ It is free for privat use.
I have not look at this, thanks for the lead. I suspect it will be
like teamview so traffic is routed via external servers. If so I
think just connecting to a VNC style server to see my desktop would
be preferable.
VNC? Way overkill. I just use SSH. :)
Not for me :)
On 28 Sep 2020 at 03:51p, Blue White pondered and said...
Unless, of course, you mean a different nautilus besides the file
manager?
Thanks for the tips and the names to look at :)
Yep I'm talking about the file manager :)
I'm wanting to be able to use VNC from my windows machine so I can
remote in to the Debian box and do admin stuff from within my home
LAN. I' not thinking this is something I want to be able to do from outside the home.
There seem to be several web walk through articles for this some more detailed than others. I found this one https://tinyurl.com/yxt6ylmp
and this other one https://tinyurl.com/yxfuwd2k which both want me to
use ssh and install xfce.
Do you think is a good idea / best instructs to follow?
On 10-05-20 09:03, Avon wrote to Vk3jed <=-
On 04 Oct 2020 at 09:17p, Vk3jed pondered and said...
VNC? Way overkill. I just use SSH. :)
Not for me :)
On 10-04-20 16:47, Al wrote to Avon <=-
VNC? Way overkill. I just use SSH. :)
Not for me :)
I agree with vk3jed. At least in this case when working on the BBS or other FTN things like the husky stuff and binkd. This software is all command line stuff and a desktop is not any help when working with any
of that.
A desktop is great too.. and I love the desktop for browsing the web or playing DOOM or quake.. ;) but when working on the BBS or BBSing a
command line is where it is at.
On 10-04-20 12:57, Oli wrote to Avon <=-
Do you want to start a virtual (headless) X server or do you want to connect to the desktop X server that is using the video card/monitor?
I'm wanting to be able to use VNC from my windows machine so I
can remote in to the Debian box and do admin stuff from within
my home LAN. I' not thinking this is something I want to be
VNC? Way overkill. I just use SSH. :)
On 10-04-20 12:57, Oli wrote to Avon <=-
Do you want to start a virtual (headless) X server or do you want to
connect to the desktop X server that is using the video
card/monitor?
What's a good headlexx X server to use nowadays for VNC access? I've got
a use case for one.
On 04 Oct 2020 at 12:57p, Oli pondered and said...
Do you want to start a virtual (headless) X server or do you want to
connect to
the desktop X server that is using the video card/monitor?
Ideally the latter... I'm understanding that I could (if it all works) connect to a different desktop than the one I see with the login/monitor attached but ideally I'd like to be able to just remote connect and
see/use the same desktop I do now.
to me vnc was not very smooth and stable. but if i had to use it, i used it via vpn (my dsl router offers a vpn functionality) and then from
inside my lan with vnc.
but in general i prefer anydesk or teamviewer. are you sure they route
the traffic via external server always?
I agree with vk3jed. At least in this case when working on the BBS or other FTN
things like the husky stuff and binkd. This software is all command line stuff and a desktop is not any help when working with any of that.
A desktop is great too.. and I love the desktop for browsing the web or playing
I second using MC Avon, its a very versatile file manager and gives you side by
I use realvnc and as long as not commercial its completely free even the ability to access them from outside the house, up to 5 machines.. very slick..
VNC? Way overkill. I just use SSH. :)Haha why not? ;)
Not for me :)
RealVNC has a deb package. I haven't tried it, but maybe it does work
like the RealVNC server on Raspbian. TightVNC has the x0vncserver
command and the xorg-extension:
Your fogetting that Avon, comes from a windows world. #-)
* Forwarded from area 'fsx_net'
On 04 Oct 2020 at 11:24p, Rick Smith pondered and said...
I use realvnc and as long as not commercial its completely free
even the ability to access them from outside the house, up to 5
machines.. very slick..
I found this today, there are some limits in that the traffic is
routed via the internet, if you want just a direct connect between 2 systems over the home LAN you can't do that (I think) with the 'free
home version' ..
Not sure I know what you mean routed through internet? I use a local ip
to get to one machine or the other, I unplugged my UDM Pro from the internet and can still get to all my vnc machines. It gives you the ability to get to them from the internet but you do not need the
internet to access all the machines you want on your local network.
On 10-05-20 16:12, vorlon wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Hey vk3jed,
I'm wanting to be able to use VNC from my windows machine so I
can remote in to the Debian box and do admin stuff from within
my home LAN. I' not thinking this is something I want to be
VNC? Way overkill. I just use SSH. :)
Your fogetting that Avon, comes from a windows world. #-)
On 10-05-20 17:45, Oli wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I don't know what the best solution is. I would try TigerVNC first:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/TigerVNC
On 10-06-20 16:58, Avon wrote to Vk3jed <=-
On 05 Oct 2020 at 07:34p, Vk3jed pondered and said...
VNC? Way overkill. I just use SSH. :)Haha why not? ;)
Not for me :)
because I like to look at desktops :)
And efficiency goes down the toilet. :P
Your fogetting that Avon, comes from a windows world. #-)
Go to the head of the class young man, pass go and collect $200
VNC? Way overkill. I just use SSH. :)
Your fogetting that Avon, comes from a windows world. #-)
Avon needs reducating. :P I do use PuTTY from a Windows desktop
here. ;)
https://www.realvnc.com/en/connect/pricing/
I'm referring to the 'direct connectivity' feature, but if I
misunderstand it, I apologise.
On 05 Oct 2020 at 05:57p, Oli pondered and said...
RealVNC has a deb package. I haven't tried it, but maybe it does
work like the RealVNC server on Raspbian. TightVNC has the
x0vncserver command and the xorg-extension:
I mucked around today with tightvnc and got that working well but it only serves us a virtual desktop and not the view of the logged in user on the box.
VNC? Way overkill. I just use SSH. :)
Your fogetting that Avon, comes from a windows world. #-)
Avon needs reducating. :P I do use PuTTY from a Windows desktop here.
;)
I use TightVNC to control pcs (Windows) within the same LAN. I
like the full GUI presentation and seeing the familiarity of
the remote desktop. I experimented with UltraVNC for a little
while, but I switched to TightVNC for some reason.
Go to the head of the class young man, pass go and collect $200You cheapskate. That means I would only get $185.71 AUD... #-(
I intended to write "TigerVNC" not "TightVNC". There are to many options for remote desktop sharing in Linux and most of them are not very good
(if you compare it with a Windows RDP session). Something is always missing. Most VNC projects also don't have good documentation.
Now distributions are switching from X11 to Wayland – even more fun..
If I understand it correctly Gnome Wayland uses the pipewire audio/video server.
Now, now... Avon needs to get a handle on how Linux works, which is
easier to do with the GUI. Give him some time to learn, then he can
start looking at how much he can do with just SSH. ;)
Heh, I've yet to learn how to install and configure SSH - bahahah
Will just have to agree to disagree on this one... :)
Heh, I've yet to learn how to install and configure SSH - bahahah
Have you tried ssh? I don't mean to be pushy but I think that is just
what you need. :)
I've used Putty to login to a Linux system using a SSH connection and then got to a command line experience...
On 10-06-20 20:27, apam wrote to Vk3jed <=-
And efficiency goes down the toilet. :P
Now now, efficiency for you perhaps. Not necessarily everyone.
Some people think that using a mouse is less efficient than using a keyboard. That's really an extension of using the command line vs using
a desktop.
Computers running BBS networks are more than powerful enough to support
a desktop running at the same time, so really your being wasteful not running a desktop, all those idle cycles :P
But really, it comes down to preference. If it were on a minimal VPS I
can see a desktop being more hassle than it's worth, but on a computer with a monitor plugged in, why not?
If you're more comfortable using a desktop, install a desktop I say.
After all, our computers are meant to work for us, not the other way around.
I use a mouse all the time when I'm coding... maybe that makes me
inferior to a keyboard wiz but I don't really care :)
On 10-06-20 23:28, vorlon wrote to Vk3jed <=-
VNC? Way overkill. I just use SSH. :)
Your fogetting that Avon, comes from a windows world. #-)
Avon needs reducating. :P I do use PuTTY from a Windows desktop
here. ;)
We can lead him to water, but just like a horse can't force him. *-)
He needs to see the light on his own. #_)
On 10-06-20 12:40, Black Panther wrote to Vk3jed <=-
On 06 Oct 2020, 08:11p, Vk3jed said the following...
Now, now... Avon needs to get a handle on how Linux works, which is
easier to do with the GUI. Give him some time to learn, then he can
start looking at how much he can do with just SSH. ;)
On 10-07-20 08:38, Avon wrote to Black Panther <=-
On 06 Oct 2020 at 12:40p, Black Panther pondered and said...
Now, now... Avon needs to get a handle on how Linux works, which is
easier to do with the GUI. Give him some time to learn, then he can
start looking at how much he can do with just SSH. ;)
Heh, I've yet to learn how to install and configure SSH - bahahah
On 10-07-20 10:42, Avon wrote to Al <=-
Have you tried ssh? I don't mean to be pushy but I think that is just
what you need. :)
I've used Putty to login to a Linux system using a SSH connection and
then got to a command line experience... if that's what you're asking?
https://www.realvnc.com/en/connect/pricing/
I'm referring to the 'direct connectivity' feature, but if I
misunderstand it, I apologise.
No worries, it is worth checking out.. easy as heck to setup on any OS I run it on debian, pi and windows
Well, at least on today's hardware, the overhead of VNC isn't like it waswhen
I first started using it.
True. For me, it's a lot easier to blindly send a sequence of commandsthan it
is to blindly use a mouse - the latter requires constant monitoring of its location and state to use, as well as constant control.
location and state to use, as well as constant control. Keyboard, I cansend a
few keystrokes, go away, do something else while waiting, and then somemore
keystrokes. ;)
It's all crap. use the tools you're most comfortable with, if they get
the job done then what's the issue?
* Forwarded from area 'fsx_net'
Rick wrote (2020-10-06):
https://www.realvnc.com/en/connect/pricing/
I'm referring to the 'direct connectivity' feature, but if I
misunderstand it, I apologise.
No worries, it is worth checking out.. easy as heck to setup on
any OS I run it on debian, pi and windows
Do you need to register/signup on realvnc.com to use the free version? Does the realvnc client/server send some data to realvnc.com?
Greetings Oli!
Do you need to register/signup on realvnc.com to use the free
version? Does the realvnc client/server send some data to
realvnc.com?
you only need to register online if you intend on accessing it from outside your local network..
Now now, efficiency for you perhaps. Not necessarily everyone.
aot install openssh-server on a modern Debian based distro will get you a server. On your Windows client, PuTTY does a good job. :)
Earlier polls to your 3/100 from 1/10 look like this[2001:8003:4c06:5742:f1d0:3:279:1fd]...
08 Oct 21:21:24 [50240] trying alterant.leenooks.net
On 10-07-20 22:11, apam wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I can't touch type, I have to look at the screen, and no a mouse does
not need constant control. Most of the time you are infact using the keyboard, mouse is just a tool to help with that. I mean you don't
enter text with your mouse do you? You just select where you want it to go.
And you can do that when using a mouse too, because the mouse isn't
being used in one constant session, it's many smaller sessions.
You often talk about web forums being difficult for you to use. Yet I
find web forums to be easy to use. Would it be right for me to say you should just get used to it?
It's a common theme among technical people to look down their nose at people who are less "elite" than them. Using the command line vs using graphical tools is just one thing, using a mouse, how obscure your
window manager is. If you use freebsd or linux or (gasp) windows.
I've reverted the IPv6 name for now, but we should probably change the
hub to n3.z21.bbs.leenooks.net - that way it'll always point to the
right place.
find web forums to be easy to use. Would it be right for me to say yo should just get used to it?
Fair point, and you've taken this all too seriously for what was a lighthearted poke.
I could set up a CNAME to that if you want, I was thinking we establish some naming convention in the fsxnet.nz domain space for HUBs and
promote those addresses to nodes... something like net3.fsxnet.nz or similar.. what do you think?
That's not a bad idea. My only concern, is I have a dynamic IP address.
If you do that for net4, you may just want to point to bbs.castlerockbbs.com, as I keep that updated as necessary.
I think my IP address has only changed once or twice in the last 3
years, so it doesn't change often...
some naming convention in the fsxnet.nz domain space for HUBs and promote thoseI've reverted the IPv6 name for now, but we should probably change the
hub to n3.z21.bbs.leenooks.net - that way it'll always point to the
right place.
I could set up a CNAME to that if you want, I was thinking we establish
I've started using nN.zZ.bbs.leenooks.net for nets that I hub for, since I've really seperated out the hub from my BBS. And now that I've starting setting up IPv6 it means I dont have NAT to worry about. (But there is a tranisition impact for those that can do IPv6 as we discovered yesterday).
Yeah, that's kinda why I thought a CNAME type alias may be a good move for
sit on.
On another note, it seems the IPv6 rollout is ramping out (my ISP was quite backwards and concervative, and now I have it), so wondering how many do have an IPv6 address...
changing this to n3.z21.bbs.leenooks.net?I've started using nN.zZ.bbs.leenooks.net for nets that I hub for, since I've really seperated out the hub from my BBS. And now that I've starting setting up IPv6 it means I dont have NAT to worry about. (But there is a tranisition impact for
those that can do IPv6 as we discovered yesterday).
I'm still setup to poll/send to alterant.leenooks.net. Should I be
I've got one!
bbs.nrbbs.net = 2607:fea8:ab00:e4f:934f:85c:ad29:d978
Cool, I probably already connect to you over IPv6? So if you change to the n3.z21... address, you'll connect directly to my container.
Technically, my IPv6 address is dynamic.
I think its tied to the MAC address that connects to the network - so it has changed a couple of times as I've rejigged my equipment. (Not
recently though, which is why I'm more confident to publicize it more).
I will be changing providers soon that guarantee "me" a static IP (both IPv6 and IPv4) - so naturally when I do that, I want that to be as transparent as possible. SO yes, a CNAME back to what I use means your
not involved nor a dependancy in that change.
My static name for hubing networks, going forward will be a semi fido DNS standard, ie: FSX will be nF.zZZ.bbs.leenooks.net (where F and Z are the appropriate net and zone numbers).
On another note, it seems the IPv6 rollout is ramping out (my ISP was quite backwards and concervative, and now I have it), so wondering how many do have an IPv6 address...
I could set up a CNAME to that if you want, I was thinking we establish some naming convention in the fsxnet.nz domain space for HUBs and
promote those addresses to nodes... something like net3.fsxnet.nz or similar.. what do you think?
So, just pondering a naming convention.
net1.fsxnet.nz
So, just pondering a naming convention.
net1.fsxnet.nz
hub1.fsxnet.nz
..then I'm all tapped out - ha!
This is 6, or is it half a dozen? :)
As I tell all the women I meet - I'm easy, still doesnt get me anywhere though .... ?
net1.fsxnet.nz
I think this would be the best choice.
On 08 Oct 2020 at 08:24p, alterego pondered and said...
I've reverted the IPv6 name for now, but we should probably change
the hub to n3.z21.bbs.leenooks.net - that way it'll always point to
the right place.
I could set up a CNAME to that if you want, I was thinking we establish some naming convention in the fsxnet.nz domain space for HUBs and promote those addresses to nodes... something like net3.fsxnet.nz or similar..
what do you think?
I'm still setup to poll/send to alterant.leenooks.net. Should I be
changing this to n3.z21.bbs.leenooks.net?
Yes you can.
I am in the middle of drafting an email, but was going to wait sending it until Avon decides on his CNAME idea.
At the end of the day, Avon's CNAME will point to n3.z21.... so by you using that directly, or whatever Avon configures - it will still work.
I usually use whatever address is in the nodelist. Why not use A and AAAAon the same domain?
On another note, it seems the IPv6 rollout is ramping out (my ISP
was quite backwards and concervative, and now I have it), so
wondering how many do have an IPv6 address...
More than you would expect, I seem to get a few polling in / and can poll them outbound also using it, which is cool.
was quite backwards and concervative, and now I have it), so
wondering how many do have an IPv6 address...
More than you would expect, I seem to get a few polling in / and can them outbound also using it, which is cool.
After being tntroduced in December 1995 (24 years ago) it's finally happening! ;)
By: Avon to All on Fri Oct 09 2020 03:48 pm
So, just pondering a naming convention.
net1.fsxnet.nz
I could set up a CNAME to that if you want, I was thinking we establis some naming convention in the fsxnet.nz domain space for HUBs and prom those addresses to nodes... something like net3.fsxnet.nz or similar.. what do you think?
Would it make things easier or more reliable? Isn't it just an
additional layer
and potential point of failure? What about SRV records?
But what do I care, I'm connecting to the .onion address over Tor anyway
I'm working on this now.
I'm still setup to poll/send to alterant.leenooks.net. Should I bechanging this to n3.z21.bbs.leenooks.net?
Yes you can.
I am in the middle of drafting an email, but was going to wait sending
it until
Avon decides on his CNAME idea.
At the end of the day, Avon's CNAME will point to n3.z21.... so by you using that directly, or whatever Avon configures - it will still work.
Just wondering what are your thoughts about provisioning for a separateIPv4 and IPv6 address to give folks the option of forcing a
poll using a domain
they know will point only to IPv4 or IPv6?
Seems like a good option to offer.
net1.fsxnet.nz to point to both my A and AAAA records and was thinking ofsomething like
ipv4.net1.fsxnet.nz
ipv6.net1.fsxnet.nz
or similar. What do you think?
I have set net3.fsxnet.nz to CNAME to this new schema you have set at
your end. If you do have any specific v4 or v6 addresses I can point to down the track let me know so I can set a A or AAAA record for it :)
I have set net3.fsxnet.nz to CNAME to this new schema you have set at your end. If you do have any specific v4 or v6 addresses I can point to downthe track let me know so I can set a A or AAAA record for it
:)
Is this a problem needing a fix?
It would introduce more points of management that I'm not keen on. As I say, technically I'm dynamic IPs until I change suppliers, and i'm a few weeks away from doing that. So if my IP changes I've already got enough moving parts that I need to fix, so not really looking for more (if it isnt a problem).
ipv4.net1.fsxnet.nz
ipv6.net1.fsxnet.nz
or similar. What do you think?
There are advantages to this naming convention - as you can then
delegate out that part of your zone. EG: For those with dynamic IPs, I'm assuming you wont have an API so that folks can dyndns update their
A/AAAA record? But they could delegate that out to cloudflare (for example), and use cloudflares API to do those dyndns updates.
Actually, I'm wondering if Synchronet can do that as well - since DM provides a dynamic DNS service for synchro.net
net3.fsxnet.nz is an alias for n3.z21.bbs.leenooks.net. n3.z21.bbs.leenooks.net is an alias for fidohub.leenooks.net. fidohub.leenooks.net has address 101.186.5.106
fidohub.leenooks.net has IPv6 address 2001:8003:4c06:5742:f1d0:a:1:1
Looks good from here:
Looks good from here:
net3.fsxnet.nz is an alias for n3.z21.bbs.leenooks.net. n3.z21.bbs.leenooks.net is an alias for fidohub.leenooks.net. fidohub.leenooks.net has address 101.186.5.106
fidohub.leenooks.net has IPv6 address 2001:8003:4c06:5742:f1d0:a:1:1
I changed the Mystic HUB over to poll you using the new domain, also seems fine :)
14:00:32 1-Connected by IPV4 SSL to 101.186.5.106
Hmmm.. surprised you came in over IPv4 - I thought you had IPv6?
I know you can setup "preferences" to use one over the other that might
be in play here...
On 10-10-20 13:37, Avon wrote to Oli <=-
Where we have HUBs that don't have static IPv4 or IPv6 addresses then
the option to have a CNAME seemed like a way to offer a standardized fsxNet net domain name to poll without needing to know it's error404 or leenooks etc.
SRV records I know little of but if there's a good way to use them I'm
all ears :)
On 10-10-20 13:19, Avon wrote to alterego <=-
I've set
net1.fsxnet.nz to point to both my A and AAAA records and was thinking
of something like
ipv4.net1.fsxnet.nz
ipv6.net1.fsxnet.nz
or similar. What do you think?
On 09 Oct 2020 at 09:07a, Oli pondered and said...
I could set up a CNAME to that if you want, I was thinking we
establis some naming convention in the fsxnet.nz domain space
for HUBs and prom those addresses to nodes... something like
net3.fsxnet.nz or similar.. what do you think?
Would it make things easier or more reliable? Isn't it just an
additional layer
and potential point of failure? What about SRV records?
Well good question. I'm coming at this from the POV that it's
standardizing the information we can give new nodes such that if they are polling fsxNet NET 1 instead of polling agency.bbs.nz they use net1.fsxnet.nz and certainly cosmetically and perhaps more intuitively seems a better thing to be typing in to the domain field.
Where we have HUBs that don't have static IPv4 or IPv6 addresses then the option to have a CNAME seemed like a way to offer a standardized fsxNet
net domain name to poll without needing to know it's error404 or leenooks etc.
SRV records I know little of but if there's a good way to use them I'm all ears :)
But what do I care, I'm connecting to the .onion address over Tor
anyway
indeed :) I'm not sure if there's a need for me to do any DNS stuff in the fsxnet.nz domain space for this that would help? If there is, lemme know.
Yep it is, just tried IPv6 and got this
20:46:53 1-Using address 2001:8003:4C06:5742:F1D0:000A:0001:0001
20:46:59 1-Unable to connect
Hmm, we actually have hubs with dynamic IPs? Another challenge (thoughnot a big one these days). :)
On 10-10-20 21:32, alterego wrote to Vk3jed <=-
What's the challenge?
I run quite a few services that are at the end of a dynamic IPs, and
been doing it for donkeys.
Sysop: | Weed Hopper |
---|---|
Location: | Clearwater, FL |
Users: | 14 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 102:50:25 |
Calls: | 40 |
Files: | 50,067 |
D/L today: |
100 files (17,374K bytes) |
Messages: | 268,227 |